The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding pre‐service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model
Abstract
Abstract Computers are increasingly widespread, influencing many aspects of our social and work lives, As we move into a technology‐based society, it is important that classroom experiences with computers are made available for all students. The purpose of this study is to examine pre‐service teachers' attitudes towards computers. This study extends the technology acceptance model (TAM) framework, with subjective norm and facilitating conditions acting as external variables. Results shows that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and subjective norm were significant determinants of pre‐service computer attitudes. Facilitating conditions did not influence computer attitude directly but through perceived ease of use. These findings demonstrate that social norm and facilitating conditions are potential variables that may be used to extend the TAM for research on computer attitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00101-3 · Cited by 1,772
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.-M., & Tam, K.-Y. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692 · Cited by 827
Cited by
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
Self-citationTeo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002 · Cited by 531
Self-citationConsumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom
Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022 · Cited by 511
The acceptance and use of computer based assessment
Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-143
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W2142358096
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 37.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding pre‐service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x
- The paper
- Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre‐service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
