The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory
Abstract
Background The Special Interest Quality of Life Group has updated its set of statements defining the quality of life (QOL) construct to reflect emerging areas of agreement and the framework for understanding better the QOL construct. Method This article examines the major areas currently under discussion involving the objective–subjective dichotomy, needs, and core domains. Results It is concluded that while the new statements constitute a significant advance, further progress requires testable theory. In order to facilitate such future research, a conceptual model is proposed that distinguishes causal and indicator variables within the framework of a homeostatic management system. Conclusion Several lines of empirical investigation are suggested to test this and similar theoretical models with a view to taking our conceptualization of QOL to the next level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,466
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113
Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control.
Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.5 · Cited by 2,102
Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.731 · Cited by 1,221
The principle of normalization in human services
Wolfensberger, W. P. (1996) · Graduate Medical Education Research Journal · Cited by 1,070
Developing a National Index of Subjective Wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1024704320683 · Cited by 1,061
Self-citationAging and health: effects of the sense of control
Rodin, J. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3749877 · Cited by 959
Schalock, R. L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R. A., Felce, D., Matikka, L., Keith, K. D., & Parmenter, T. (2002) · Mental Retardation · doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0457:cmaaoq>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 666
Self-citationObjective and Subjective Quality of Life: an Interactive Model
Cummins, R. A. (2000) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007027822521 · Cited by 665
Self-citation
Cited by
Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?
Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9 · Cited by 1,646
The Impact of Stuttering on the Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter
Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y. (2009) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002 · Cited by 490
Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, and Health-Related Quality of Life in School-Aged Children
Gu, X., Chang, M., & Solmon, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2015-0110 · Cited by 150
Chan, R., Brooks, R., Steel, Z., Heung, T., Erlich, J., Chow, J., & Suranyi, M. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9973-9 · Cited by 48
Owen, F., Li, J., Whittingham, L., Hope, J., Bishop, C., Readhead, A., & Mook, L. (2015) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21187 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummins, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-13
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 699-706
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W2049168714
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00738.x
- The paper
- Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00738.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
