The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The contribution of marital quality to the well‐being of parents of children with developmental disabilities
Abstract
Background This study examines the contribution of the marital relationship to the well‐being of both mothers and fathers of children with developmental disabilities. Parent well‐being is conceptualized in terms of mental health, parenting stress and parenting efficacy. Methods These analyses are based on data from 67 families participating in the Early Intervention Collaborative Study, an ongoing longitudinal investigation of the development of children with disabilities and the adaptation of their families. Multidimensional assessment techniques were used to collect data from married mothers and fathers and their child with a disability. Mother and father data were analysed separately using parallel hierarchical regression models. Results For both mothers and fathers, greater marital quality predicted lower parenting stress and fewer depressive symptoms above and beyond socio‐economic status, child characteristics and social support. In relation to parenting efficacy, marital quality added significant unique variance for mothers but not for fathers. For fathers, greater social support predicted increased parenting efficacy. Child behaviour was also a powerful predictor of parental well‐being for both mothers and fathers. Conclusion The findings support the importance of the marital relationship to parental well‐being and illustrate the value of including fathers in studies of children with developmental disabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Measure of Parenting Satisfaction and Efficacy
Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Child Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8 · Cited by 1,840
Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review
Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004 · Cited by 1,743
Baker, B. L., McIntyre, L. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K., Edelbrock, C., & Low, C. (2003) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00484.x · Cited by 930
Baucom, D. H., Shoham, V., Mueser, K. T., Daiuto, A. D., & Stickle, T. R. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.53 · Cited by 608
Stoneman, Z., & Gavidia-Payne, S. (2006) · American Journal on Mental Retardation · doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[1:maifoy]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Parenting stress and child behavior problems: a transactional relationship across time
Neece, C. L., Green, S. A., & Baker, B. L. (2012) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.48 · Cited by 953
Neece, C. L. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.12064 · Cited by 307
Respite Care, Marital Quality, and Stress in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Harper, A., Dyches, T. T., Harper, J., Roper, S. O., & South, M. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1812-0 · Cited by 200
Lau, W., & Peterson, C. C. (2011) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.001 · Cited by 70
Lewallen, A. C., & Neece, C. L. (2015) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0116-8 · Cited by 56
Vanegas, S. B., & Abdelrahim, R. (2016) · Journal of Family Social Work · doi:10.1080/10522158.2016.1218399 · Cited by 55
Vismara, L., Sechi, C., & Lucarelli, L. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04292 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kersh, J., Hedvat, T. T., Hauser‐Cram, P., & Warfield, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 883-893
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W2031155343
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.