Cited by 64Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol for identifying individuals at increased cardiovascular risk.

Open access
Holewijn, S., Den Heijer, M., Swinkels, D. W., H Stalenhoef, A. F., De Graaf, J.·2010·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract. Holewijn S, den Heijer M, Swinkels DW, Stalenhoef AFH, de Graaf J. (Address: Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Department of Endocrinology; and Department of Laboratory Medicine; Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, all at the Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Apolipoprotein B, non‐HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol for identifying individuals at increased cardiovascular risk. J Intern Med 2010; 268: 567–577. Background. To compare apolipoprotein B (apoB), nonhigh‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (non‐HDL‐c) and low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐c) for identifying individuals with a deteriorated cardiovascular (CV) risk profile, including a panel of subclinical atherosclerosis measurements and prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Dutch population‐based cohort. Methods. Clinical and biochemical measurements and a panel of noninvasive parameters of subclinical atherosclerosis were determined in 1517 individuals, aged 50–70 years. Results. Both men and women with increasing levels of apoB and non‐HDL‐c were more obese, had higher blood pressure and fasting glucose levels, and a more atherogenic lipid profile. Furthermore, compared to the reference group (composed of those with apoB, non‐HDL‐c and LDL‐c levels in the bottom quartiles), participants with high apoB and high non‐HDL‐c levels had a lower ankle–brachial index at rest (−3.5% and −3.1%, respectively) and after exercise (−6.3% and −4.7%, respectively), a thicker near wall (+4.8% and +4.2%, respectively), far wall (both +6.2%), and mean intima–media thickness (+5.7% and +5.3%, respectively) and more plaques (+54.2% and +54.3%, respectively). In addition, they also showed increased stiffness parameters (e.g. pulse wave velocity both +3.6%). Less clear differences in CV risk profile and subclinical atherosclerosis parameters were observed when participants were stratified by LDL‐c level. Furthermore, apoB but not LDL‐c detected prevalent CVD, and non‐HDL‐c only detected prevalent CVD in men. The discriminatory power for prevalent CVD expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.60 (P < 0.001) for apoB, 0.57 (P = 0.001) for non‐HDL‐c and 0.54 (P = 0.108) for LDL‐c. Conclusion. Our data support the use of first apoB and secondly non‐HDL‐c above LDL‐c for identifying individuals from the general population with a compromised CV phenotype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02277.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holewijn, S., Den Heijer, M., Swinkels, D. W., H Stalenhoef, A. F., & De Graaf, J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Holewijn, S.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
268
Issue
6
Pages
567-577
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W1920570639
Cited by
64
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, subclinical atherosclerosis, ankle-brachial index, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, pulse wave velocity, arterial stiffness, atherogenic lipid profile, cardiovascular risk prediction, middle-aged adults, obesity, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Aged, Apolipoproteins B, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review