Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing isolated cardiac sarcoidosis

Kandolin, R., Lehtonen, J., Graner, M., Schildt, J., Salmenkivi, K., Kivistö, S. M., Kupari, M.·2011·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) without clinically apparent extracardiac disease may escape detection because of the poor sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). We set out to analyse our experience of repeated and imaging-guided biopsies in clinically isolated CS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, laboratory test results, imaging studies and pathological analyses of 74 patients with either histologically proven or clinically probable CS at our institution between January 2000 and December 2010. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients had histologically proven CS, of whom 33 (26 women) had disease that was clinically isolated to the heart. Sarcoidosis was detected in the first EMB in 10 of the 31 patients who underwent biopsy. CS was found by repeated EMBs, targeted by cardiac imaging, in seven additional patients, and 11 patients were diagnosed by sampling 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose position emission tomography-positive mediastinal lymph nodes at mediastinoscopy. Together, the first biopsy (cardiac or mediastinal lymph node) provided the diagnosis in 34%, the second biopsy in 31% and the third in 22% of biopsied patients with isolated CS. Four (13%) of the remaining diagnosis were made after cardiac transplantation and one in a patient who did not undergo biopsy) at autopsy after sudden cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac sarcoidosis may present without clinically apparent disease in other organs. At least two-thirds of patients remain undiagnosed after a single EMB session. The detection rate can be improved by repeated and imaging-guided cardiac or mediastinal lymph-node biopsies. Nevertheless, false-negative biopsy results remain a problem in CS patients with no apparent extracardiac disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02396.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Kandolin, R., Lehtonen, J., Graner, M., Schildt, J., Salmenkivi, K., Kivistö, S. M., & Kupari, M.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
270
Issue
5
Pages
461-468
ISSN
0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1499209871
Cited by
253
References
22
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing isolated cardiac sarcoidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02396.x
The paper
Kandolin, R., Lehtonen, J., Graner, M., Schildt, J., Salmenkivi, K., Kivistö, S. M., & Kupari, M. (2011). Diagnosing isolated cardiac sarcoidosis. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02396.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.