Cited by 41Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Educational impact of in‐training assessment (ITA) in postgraduate medical education: a qualitative study of an ITA programme in actual practice

Ringsted, C, Henriksen, A H, Skaarup, A M, Van der Vleuten, C P M·2004·Medical Education

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the experiences and opinions of programme directors, clinical supervisors and trainees on an in‐training assessment (ITA) programme on a broad spectrum of competence for first year training in anaesthesiology. How does the programme work in practice and what are the benefits and barriers? What are the users' experiences and thoughts about its effect on training, teaching and learning? What are their attitudes towards this concept of assessment? Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with programme directors, supervisors and trainees from 3 departments. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. The content of the interviews was analysed in a consensus process among the authors. Results The programme was of benefit in making goals and objectives clear, in structuring training, teaching and learning, and in monitoring progress and managing problem trainees. There was a generally positive attitude towards assessment. Trainees especially appreciated the coupling of theory with practice and, in general, the programme inspired an academic dialogue. Issues of uncertainty regarding standards of performance and conflict with service declined over time and experience with the programme, and departments tended to resolve practical problems through structured planning. Discussion Three interrelated factors appeared to influence the perceived value of assessment in postgraduate education: (1) the link between patient safety and individual practice when assessment is used as a licence to practise without supervision rather than as an end‐of‐training examination; (2) its benefits to educators and learners as an educational process rather than as merely a method of documenting competence, and (3) the attitude and rigour of assessment practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01841.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar results have been found for in-training assessment programmes during postgraduate medical education.

    “Similar results have been found for in-training assessment programmes during postgraduate medical education.43”

    From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringsted, C., Henriksen, A. H., Skaarup, A. M., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
Affiliations
Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Ringsted, C
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-10
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
767-777
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2081520789
Cited by
41
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
in-training assessment, graduate medical education, anesthesiology education, trainee assessment, program directors, clinical supervisors, trainee experiences, competency assessment, patient safety, assessment standards, trainee supervision, teaching-learning process
MeSH terms
Anesthesiology, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Denmark, Education, Medical, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Inservice Training, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review