Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the effects of problem‐based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking

Tiwari, Agnes, Lai, Patrick, So, Mike, Yuen, Kwan·2006·Medical Education

Abstract

Background Educational approaches are thought to have facilitative or hindering effects on students' critical thinking development. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of problem‐based learning (PBL) and lecturing approaches on the development of students' critical thinking. Methods All 79 Year 1 undergraduate nursing students at a university in Hong Kong were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 parallel courses delivered by either PBL ( n = 40) or lecturing ( n = 39) over 1 academic year. The primary outcome measure was students' critical thinking disposition as measured by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI). Individual interviews were also conducted to elicit the students' perceptions of their learning experience. Data were collected at 4 timepoints spanning 3 years. Results The overall CCTDI and subscale scores for the PBL group were not significantly different from those of the lecture group at the first timepoint (pretest). Compared with lecture students, PBL students showed significantly greater improvement in overall CCTDI ( P = 0.0048), Truthseeking ( P = 0.0008), Analyticity ( P = 0.0368) and Critical Thinking Self‐confidence ( P = 0.0342) subscale scores from the first to the second timepoints; in overall CCTDI ( P = 0.0083), Truthseeking ( P = 0.0090) and Analyticity ( P = 0.0354) subscale scores from the first to the third timepoints; and in Truthseeking ( P = 0.0173) and Systematicity ( P = 0.0440) subscale scores from the first to the fourth timepoints. Conclusions There were significant differences in the development of students' critical thinking dispositions between those who undertook the PBL and lecture courses, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Metadata

Authors
Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-15
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
547-554
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2089172200
Cited by
438
References
21
FWCI
52.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the effects of problem‐based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x
The paper
Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem‐based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.