The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics
Abstract
Understanding how spatial genetic patterns respond to landscape change is crucial for advancing the emerging field of landscape genetics. We quantified the number of generations for new landscape barrier signatures to become detectable and for old signatures to disappear after barrier removal. We used spatially explicit, individual-based simulations to examine the ability of an individual-based statistic [Mantel's r using the proportion of shared alleles' statistic (Dps)] and population-based statistic (FST ) to detect barriers. We simulated a range of movement strategies including nearest neighbour dispersal, long-distance dispersal and panmixia. The lag time for the signal of a new barrier to become established is short using Mantel's r (1-15 generations). FST required approximately 200 generations to reach 50% of its equilibrium maximum, although G'ST performed much like Mantel's r. In strong contrast, FST and Mantel's r perform similarly following the removal of a barrier formerly dividing a population. Also, given neighbour mating and very short-distance dispersal strategies, historical discontinuities from more than 100 generations ago might still be detectable with either method. This suggests that historical events and landscapes could have long-term effects that confound inferences about the impacts of current landscape features on gene flow for species with very little long-distance dispersal. Nonetheless, populations of organisms with relatively large dispersal distances will lose the signal of a former barrier within less than 15 generations, suggesting that individual-based landscape genetic approaches can improve our ability to measure effects of existing landscape features on genetic structure and connectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population
COULON, A., GUILLOT, G., COSSON, J. ‐., ANGIBAULT, J. M. A., AULAGNIER, S., CARGNELUTTI, B., GALAN, M., & HEWISON, A. J. M. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02861.x · Cited by 310 · cited 1×
“Some longer-lived highly mobile species might not show effects of fragmentation on a timescale useful for making conservation and management decisions (Coulon et al. 2004) or only show weak effects (Coulon et al. 2006; Spear & Storfer 2008).”
Background
Cited by
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review
Zeller, K. A., McGarigal, K., & Whiteley, A. R. (2012) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · Cited by 1,007
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Self-citationConnectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83
Self-citationKaszta, Ż., Cushman, S. A., Hearn, A. J., Burnham, D., Macdonald, E. A., Goossens, B., Nathan, S. K. S. S., & Macdonald, D. W. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.001 · Cited by 70
Self-citationWade, A. A., McKelvey, K. S., & Schwartz, M. K. (2015) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-gtr-333 · Cited by 51
Self-citationKaszta, Ż., Cushman, S. A., & Slotow, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.553263 · Cited by 32
Self-citationVergara, M., Cushman, S. A., & Ruiz-González, A. (2017) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0512-0 · Cited by 29
Self-citationDraheim, H. M., Moore, J. A., Fortin, M., & Scribner, K. T. (2018) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12617 · Cited by 29
Spatial variation in the response of tiger gene flow to landscape features and limiting factors
Reddy, P. A., Puyravaud, J. ‐., Cushman, S. A., & Segu, H. (2019) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12488 · Cited by 22
Self-citationGray, M. E., Dickson, B. G., Nussear, K. E., Esque, T. C., & Chang, T. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2847 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- LANDGUTH, E. L., CUSHMAN, S. A., SCHWARTZ, M. K., McKELVEY, K. S., MURPHY, M., & LUIKART, G.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4179-4191
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1908957618
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.