CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of the landscape on boreal toad gene flow: does the pattern-process relationship hold true across distinct landscapes at the northern range margin?: BOREAL TOAD LANDSCAPE GENETICS

MOORE, JENNIFER A., TALLMON, DAVID A., NIELSEN, JULIE, PYARE, SANJAY·2011·Molecular Ecology
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05313.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Understanding the impact of natural and anthropogenic landscape features on population connectivity is a major goal in evolutionary ecology and conservation. Discovery of dispersal barriers is important for predicting population responses to landscape and environmental changes, particularly for populations at geographic range margins. We used a landscape genetics approach to quantify the effects of landscape features on gene flow and connectivity of boreal toad (Bufo boreas) populations from two distinct landscapes in south-east Alaska (Admiralty Island, ANM, and the Chilkat River Valley, CRV). We used two common methodologies for calculating resistance distances in landscape genetics studies (resistance based on least-cost paths and circuit theory). We found a strong effect of saltwater on genetic distance of CRV populations, but no landscape effects were found for the ANM populations. Our discordant results show the importance of examining multiple landscapes that differ in the variability of their features, to maximize detectability of underlying processes and allow results to be broadly applicable across regions. Saltwater serves as a physiological barrier to boreal toad gene flow and affects populations on a small geographic scale, yet there appear to be few other barriers to toad dispersal in this intact northern region.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05313.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Adams, 2005, Instream movement by boreal toads (Bufo boreas boreas), Herpetological Review, 36, 27
  2. Adams, 2007, Incidence of the fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, in amphibian populations along the northwest coast of North America, Herpetological Review, 38, 430
  3. Allendorf, 1981, Use of allelic frequencies to describe population structure, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38, 1507, 10.1139/f81-203 · DOI
  4. Arens, 2007, Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands, Landscape Ecology, 22, 1489, 10.1007/s10980-007-9132-4 · DOI
  5. Bartelt, 2005, Physically modeling operative temperatures and evaporation rates in amphibians, Journal of Thermal Biology, 30, 93, 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.07.007 · DOI
  6. Bartelt, 2004, Sexual differences in the post-breeding movements and habitats selected by Western toads (Bufo boreas) in southeastern Idaho, Herpetologica, 60, 455, 10.1655/01-50 · DOI
  7. Berry, 2005, Effect of vegetation matrix on animal dispersal: genetic evidence from a study of endangered skinks, Conservation Biology, 19, 855, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00161.x · DOI
  8. Blaustein, 1994, Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions, Conservation Biology, 8, 60, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010060.x · DOI
  9. Bull, 2009, Dispersal of newly metamorphosed western toads (Anaxyrus boreas) in Northeastern Oregon, USA, Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 4, 236
  10. Carey, 1993, Hypothesis concerning the causes of the disappearance of boreal toads from the mountains of Colorado, Conservation Biology, 7, 355, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07020355.x · DOI
  11. Carr, 2001, Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility, Conservation Biology, 15, 1071, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x · DOI
  12. Carstensen, 2003, Habitat Use of Amphibians in Northern Southeast Alaska: Report to ADF&G
  13. Cavalli-Sforza, 1967, Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures, American Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 233
  14. Chan, 2009, Population differentiation of temperate amphibians in unpredictable environments, Molecular Ecology, 18, 3185, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04273.x · DOI
  15. Constible, 2009, The pitfalls of extrapolation in conservation: movements and habitat use of a threatened toad are different in the boreal forest, Animal Conservation, 13, 43, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00291.x · DOI
  16. Cook, 2006, Conservation of highly fragmented systems: the north temperate Alexander Archipelago, Biological Conservation, 133, 1, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.026 · DOI
  17. Corn, 2003, Amphibian breeding and climate change: importance of snow in the mountains, Conservation Biology, 17, 622, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02111.x · DOI
  18. Cushman, 2006, Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus, Biological Conservation, 128, 231, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031 · DOI
  19. Cushman, 2006, Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling, The American Naturalist, 168, 486, 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dieringer, 2002, Microsatellite analyzer (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets, Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 167, 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00351.x · DOI
  21. Dixo, 2009, Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest, Biological Conservation, 142, 1560, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.016 · DOI
  22. Etherington, 2011, Python-based GIS tools for landscape genetics: visualising genetic relatedness and measuring landscape connectivity, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 52, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00048.x · DOI
  23. Funk, 1999, Small effective population size in the long-toed salamander, Molecular Ecology, 8, 1633, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00748.x · DOI
  24. Goldberg, 2010, Quantification and reduction of bias from sampling larvae in infer population and landscape genetic structure, Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 304, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02755.x · DOI
  25. Goslee, 2007, The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data, Journal of Statistical Software, 22, 1, 10.18637/jss.v022.i07 · DOI
  26. Goudet, 1995, FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics, Journal of Heredity, 86, 485, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 · DOI
  27. Guerry, 2002, Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration, Conservation Biology, 16, 745, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x · DOI
  28. Guo, 1992, A Monte Carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 51, 1111
  29. Hammerson, 2004, Anaxyrus boreas
  30. Holderegger, 2006, A brief guide to landscape genetics, Landscape Ecology, 21, 793, 10.1007/s10980-005-6058-6 · DOI
  31. Knutsen, 2000, Genetic differentiation among populations of the beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented and a continuous landscape, Heredity, 84, 667, 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00691.x · DOI
  32. Lee-Yaw, 2009, Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?, Molecular Ecology, 18, 1863, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04152.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Legendre, 2010, Comparison of the Mantel tests and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data, Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 831, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02866.x · DOI
  34. MacDonald, 1996, The land mammal fauna of Southeast Alaska, The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 110, 571, 10.5962/p.357533 · DOI
  35. Manel, 2009, Perspectives and challenges in landscape genetics, Molecular Ecology, 18, 1821, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04151.x · DOI
  36. Manel, 2003, Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 189, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Manel, 2010, Common factors drive adaptive genetic variation at different spatial scales in Arabis alpina, Molecular Ecology, 19, 3824, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04716.x · DOI
  38. Manier, 2006, Ecological correlates of population genetic structure: a comparative approach using a vertebrate metacommunity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 273, 3001, 10.1098/rspb.2006.3678 · DOI
  39. Mantel, 1967, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach, Cancer Research, 27, 209
  40. McRae, 2007, Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19885, 10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Murphy, 2010a, Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics, Ecology, 91, 252, 10.1890/08-0879.1 · DOI
  42. Murphy, 2010b, Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations, Molecular Ecology, 19, 3634, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04723.x · DOI
  43. Muths, 2003, Evidence for disease-related amphibian decline in Colorado, Biological Conservation, 110, 357, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00239-2 · DOI
  44. Peakall, 2006, GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research, Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x · DOI
  45. R Development Core Team, 2006, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  46. Raymond, 1995, Genepop (version-1.2) - population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism, Journal of Heredity, 86, 248, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 · DOI
  47. Rothermel, 2004, Migratory success of juveniles: a potential constraint on connectivity for pond-breeding amphibians, Ecological Applications, 14, 1535, 10.1890/03-5206 · DOI
  48. Rousset, 1997, Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance, Genetics, 145, 1219, 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1219 · DOI
  49. Roznik, 2009, Canopy closure and emigration by juvenile gopher frogs, Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 260, 10.2193/2007-493 · DOI
  50. Schmetterling, 2008, Summer movements of boreal toads (Bufo boreas boreas) in two western Montana basins, Journal of Herpetology, 42, 111, 10.1670/07-125R1.1 · DOI
  51. Schwartz, 2009, Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche, Ecology, 90, 3222, 10.1890/08-1287.1 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Segelbacher, 2010, Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges, Conservation Genetics, 11, 375, 10.1007/s10592-009-0044-5 · DOI
  53. Shah, 2008, Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008), 62
  54. Short Bull, 2011, Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains, Molecular Ecology, 20, 1092, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04944.x · DOI
  55. Simandle, 2006, Sixteen microsatellite loci for the Bufo boreas group, Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 116, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01159.x · DOI
  56. Sinsch, 1992, Structure and dynamic of a natterjack toad metapopulations (Bufo calamita), Oecologia, 90, 489, 10.1007/BF01875442 · DOI
  57. Sinsch, 1997, Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation, Oecologia, 112, 42, 10.1007/s004420050281 · DOI
  58. Smith, 2005, Dispersal and the metapopulation paradign in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations?, Ecography, 28, 110, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x · DOI
  59. Spear, 2010, Anthropogenic and natural disturbance lead to differing patterns of gene flow in the Rocky Mountain tailed frog, Ascaphus montanus, Biological Conservation, 143, 778, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.021 · DOI
  60. Spear, 2010, Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis, Molecular Ecology, 19, 3576, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x · DOI · Paper page
  61. Stevens, 2004, Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita), Landscape ecology, 19, 829, 10.1007/s10980-004-0166-6 · DOI
  62. Stevens, 2006, Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita), Oecologia, 150, 161, 10.1007/s00442-006-0500-6 · DOI
  63. Takazaki, 1996, Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite data, Genetics, 144, 389, 10.1093/genetics/144.1.389 · DOI
  64. Tallmon, 2008, ONeSAMP: a program to estimate effective population size using approximate Bayesian computation, Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 299, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01997.x · DOI
  65. Taylor, 1983, The boreal toad (Bufo boreas boreas) as a successional animal in Glacier Bay, Alaska
  66. Wang, 2004, Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors, Genetics, 166, 1963, 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Waples, 2005, Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?, Molecular Ecology, 14, 3335, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02673.x · DOI
  68. Waples, 2008, LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium, Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 753, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x · DOI
  69. Weir, 1984, Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure, Evolution, 38, 1358, 10.2307/2408641 · DOI
  70. Wright, 1931, Evolution in Mendelian populations, Genetics, 16, 0097, 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MOORE, J. A., TALLMON, D. A., NIELSEN, J., & PYARE, S.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-29
Volume
20
Issue
23
Pages
4858-4869
ISSN
0962-1083
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05313.x
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 1403 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review