Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation‐associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases

Open access
Rohde, Holger, Burdelski, Christoph, Bartscht, Katrin, Hussain, Muzaffar, Buck, Friedrich, Horstkotte, Matthias A., Knobloch, Johannes K.‐M., Heilmann, Christine, Herrmann, Mathias, Mack, Dietrich·2005·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Because of its biofilm forming potential Staphylococcus epidermidis has evolved as a leading cause of device‐related infections. The polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) is significantly involved in biofilm accumulation. However, infections because of PIA‐negative strains are not uncommon, suggesting the existence of PIA‐independent biofilm accumulation mechanisms. Here we found that biofilm formation in the clinically significant S. epidermidis 5179 depended on the expression of a truncated 140 kDa isoform of the 220 kDa accumulation‐associated protein Aap. As expression of the truncated Aap isoform leads to biofilm formation in aap‐negative S. epidermidis 1585, this domain mediates intercellular adhesion in a polysaccharide‐independent manner. In contrast, expression of full‐length Aap did not lead to a biofilm‐positive phenotype. Obviously, to gain adhesive function, full‐length Aap has to be proteolytically processed through staphylococcal proteases as demonstrated by inhibition of biofilm formation by α 2‐macroglobulin. Importantly, also exogenously added granulocyte proteases activated Aap, thereby inducing biofilm formation in S. epidermidis 5179 and four additional, independent clinical S. epidermidis strains. It is therefore reasonable to assume that in vivo effector mechanisms of the innate immunity can directly induce protein‐dependent S. epidermidis cell aggregation and biofilm formation, thereby enabling the pathogen to evade clearance by phagocytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Rohde, H., Burdelski, C., Bartscht, K., Hussain, M., Buck, F., Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K. ‐., Heilmann, C., Herrmann, M., & Mack, D.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-26
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
1883-1895
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2106553411
Cited by
398
References
61
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation‐associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x
The paper
Rohde, H., Burdelski, C., Bartscht, K., Hussain, M., Buck, F., Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K. ‐., Heilmann, C., Herrmann, M., & Mack, D. (2005). Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation‐associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.