Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining the genetic differences between wild and domestic strains of Bacillus subtilis that affect poly‐γ‐dl‐glutamic acid production and biofilm formation

Stanley, Nicola R., Lazazzera, Beth A.·2005·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Biofilms are communities of microbial cells that are encased in a self‐produced, polymeric matrix and are adherent to a surface. For several species of bacteria, an enhanced ability to form biofilms has been linked with an increased capability to produce exopolymers. To identify exopolymers of Bacillus subtilis that can contribute to biofilm formation, we transferred the genetic determinants that control exopolymer production from a wild, exopolymer‐positive strain to a domesticated, exopolymer‐negative strain. Mapping these genetic determinants led to the identification of γ‐poly‐dl‐glutamic acid (γ‐PGA) as an exopolymer that increases biofilm formation, possibly through enhancing cell–surface interactions. Production of γ‐PGA by Bacillus subtilis was known to be dependent on the two‐component regulator ComPA; this study highlighted the additional dependence on the DegS‐DegU, DegQ and SwrA regulator proteins. The inability of the domestic strain of B. subtilis to produce γ‐PGA was mapped to two base pairs; a single base pair change in the promoter region of degQ and a single base pair insertion in the coding region of swrA. Introduction of alleles of degQ and swrA from the wild strain into the domestic strain was sufficient to allow γ‐PGA production. In addition to controlling γ‐PGA production, ComPA and DegSU were also shown to activate biofilm formation through an as yet undefined pathway. The identification of these regulators as affecting γ‐PGA production and biofilm formation suggests that these processes are regulated by osmolarity, high cell density and phase variation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04746.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Stanley, N. R., & Lazazzera, B. A.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-05
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1143-1158
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2130666019
Cited by
264
References
50
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the genetic differences between wild and domestic strains of Bacillus subtilis that affect poly‐γ‐dl‐glutamic acid production and biofilm formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04746.x
The paper
Stanley, N. R., & Lazazzera, B. A. (2005). Defining the genetic differences between wild and domestic strains of Bacillus subtilis that affect poly‐γ‐dl‐glutamic acid production and biofilm formation. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04746.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.