The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large-scale bias and stochasticity of haloes and dark matter
Open accessAbstract
On large scales, galaxies and their haloes are usually assumed to trace the dark matter with a constant bias and dark matter is assumed to trace the linear density field.We test these assumption using several large N-body simulations with 384 3 -1024 3 particles and box sizes of 96-1152 h -1 Mpc, which can both resolve the small galactic-size haloes and sample the large-scale fluctuations.We explore the average halo bias relation as a function of halo mass and show that existing fitting formulae overestimate the halo bias by up to 20 per cent in the regime just below the non-linear mass.We propose a new expression that fits our simulations well.We find that the halo bias is nearly constant, b ∼ 0.65-0.7,for masses below one-tenth of the non-linear mass.We next explore the relation between the initial and final dark matter in individual Fourier modes and show that there are significant fluctuations in their ratio, ranging from 10 per cent rms at k ∼ 0.03 h Mpc -1 to 50 per cent rms at k ∼ 0.1 h Mpc -1 .We argue that these large fluctuations are caused by perturbative effects beyond the linear theory, which are dominated by long-wavelength modes with large random fluctuations.Similar or larger fluctuations exist between haloes and dark matter and between haloes of different mass.These fluctuations must be included in attempts to determine the relative bias of two populations from their maps, which would otherwise be immune to sampling variance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS
Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Warren, M. S., Yepes, G., & Gottlöber, S. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/878 · Cited by 989
Self-citationResolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., & Lemson, G. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x · Cited by 909
The Luminosity and Color Dependence of the Galaxy Correlation Function
Zehavi, I., Zheng, Z., Weinberg, D. H., Frieman, J. A., Berlind, A. A., Blanton, M. R., Scoccimarro, R., Sheth, R. K., Strauss, M. A., Kayo, I., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/431891 · Cited by 818
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Kauffmann, G., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x · Cited by 728
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Seljak, U., & Warren, M. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 355
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-136
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2121862896
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale bias and stochasticity of haloes and dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08297.x
- The paper
- Seljak, U., & Warren, M. S. (2004). Large-scale bias and stochasticity of haloes and dark matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08297.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.