Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Properties of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos from Weak Lensing

Open access
Hoekstra, Henk, Yee, H. K. C., Gladders, Michael D.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present the results of a study of weak lensing by galaxies based on 45.5 deg 2 of R C -band imaging data from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS). We define a sample of lenses with 19.5 < R C < 21 and a sample of background galaxies with 21.5 < R C < 24. We present the first weak-lensing detection of the flattening of galaxy dark matter halos. We use a simple model in which the ellipticity of the halo is f times the observed ellipticity of the lens. We find a best-fit value of f = 0.77 , which suggests that the dark matter halos are somewhat rounder than the light distribution. The fact that we detect a significant flattening implies that the halos are well aligned with the light distribution. Given the average ellipticity of the lenses, this implies a halo ellipticity of ⟨ e halo ⟩ = 0.33 , in fair agreement with results from numerical simulations of cold dark matter. We note that this result is formally a lower limit to the flattening, since the measurements imply a larger flattening if the halos are not aligned with the light distribution. Alternative theories of gravity (without dark matter) predict an isotropic lensing signal, which is excluded with 99.5% confidence. Hence, our results provide strong support for the existence of dark matter. We also study the average mass profile around the lenses, using a maximum likelihood analysis. We consider two models for the halo mass profile: a truncated isothermal sphere (TIS) and a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. We adopt observationally motivated scaling relations between the lens luminosity and the velocity dispersion and the extent of the halo. The TIS model yields a best-fit velocity dispersion of σ = 136 ± 5 ± 3 km s -1 (all errors are 68% confidence limits; the first error bar indicates the statistical uncertainty, whereas the second error bar indicates the systematic error) and a truncation radius s = 185 h -1 kpc for a galaxy with a fiducial luminosity of L B = 10 10 h -2 L B ,☉ (under the assumption that the luminosity does not evolve with redshift). Alternatively, the best-fit NFW model yields a mass M 200 = (8.4 ± 0.7 ± 0.4) × 10 11 h -1 M ☉ and a scale radius r s = 16.2 h -1 kpc. This value for the scale radius is in excellent agreement with predictions from numerical simulations for a halo of this mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/382726

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-05
Volume
606
Issue
1
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1976518783
Cited by
348
References
3
FWCI
21.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos from Weak Lensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/382726
The paper
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D. (2004). Properties of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos from Weak Lensing. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/382726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.