The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback in simulations of disc-galaxy major mergers
Open accessAbstract
Using hydrodynamic simulations of disc-galaxy major mergers, we investigate the star formation history and remnant properties when various parametrizations of a simple stellar feedback model are implemented. The simulations include radiative cooling, a density-dependent star formation recipe and a model for feedback from massive stars. The feedback model stores supernova feedback energy within individual gas particles and dissipates this energy on a time-scale specified by two free parameters; τfb, which sets the dissipative time-scale, and n, which sets the effective equation of state in star-forming regions. Via this model, feedback energy can provide pressure support to regions of gas that are thermally cold. Using a self-consistent disc galaxy, modelled after a local Sbc spiral, in both isolated and major-merger simulations, we investigate parametrizations of the feedback model that are selected with respect to the quiescent disc stability. These models produce a range of star formation histories for discs evolved in isolation, or during a major merger, yet all are consistent with the star formation relation found by Kennicutt. We suggest that this result is produced by the adopted recipe for star formation and is not a byproduct of the feedback model. All major mergers produce a population of new stars that is highly centrally concentrated, demonstrating a distinct break in the r1/4 surface density profile, consistent with previous findings. The half-mass radius and one-dimensional velocity dispersion are affected by the feedback model used. In tests with up to an order of magnitude higher resolution, the star formation history is nearly identical, suggesting that we have achieved a numerically converged star formation history. Finally, we compare our results to those of previous simulations of star formation in disc-galaxy major mergers, addressing the effects of star formation normalization, the version of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (sph) employed and assumptions about the interstellar medium. We conclude by suggesting several methods by which future studies may better constrain feedback models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical ClusteringPreprint
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · Cited by 6,275
The Global Schmidt Law in Star‐forming Galaxies
Kennicutt, Jr. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305588 · Cited by 5,202
The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2
Petkova, M., & Springel, V. (2005) · Cited by 3,918
An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges
Hernquist, L. (1990) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/168845 · Cited by 3,126
Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. (1996) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.749 · Cited by 2,786
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. (1972) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/151823 · Cited by 2,555
Cooling functions for low-density astrophysical plasmas
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/191823 · Cited by 2,434
Schmidt, M. (1959) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146614 · Cited by 2,420
Cited by
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Structure and Formation of Elliptical and Spheroidal Galaxies
Bender, R. (2016) · doi:10.15781/t28g8fm0v · Cited by 555
THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., Croton, D., Primack, J. R., Somerville, R. S., & Stewart, K. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/103 · Cited by 450
Self-citationGalaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., & Primack, J. R. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14004.x · Cited by 442
Self-citationFitting the integrated spectral energy distributions of galaxies
Walcher, J., Groves, B., Budavári, T., & Dale, D. (2011) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0458-z · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, T. J., Jonsson, P., Primack, J. R., & Somerville, R. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-13
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1013-1038
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2156673511
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feedback in simulations of disc-galaxy major mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11107.x
- The paper
- Cox, T. J., Jonsson, P., Primack, J. R., & Somerville, R. S. (2006). Feedback in simulations of disc-galaxy major mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11107.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.