The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A synthesis model for AGN evolution: supermassive black holes growth and feedback modes
Open accessAbstract
We present a comprehensive synthesis model for the active galactic nuclei (AGN) evolution and the growth of supermassive black hole (SMBH) in the Universe. We assume that black holes accrete in just three distinct physical states, or ‘modes’: at low Eddington ratio, only a radiatively inefficient, kinetically dominated mode is allowed [low kinetic (LK)]; at high Eddington ratio, instead, AGN may display both a purely radiative [radio quiet, high radiative (HR)] and a kinetic [radio loud, high kinetic (HK)] mode. We solve the continuity equation for the black hole mass function using the locally determined one as a boundary condition, and the hard X-ray luminosity function as tracer of the AGN growth rate distribution, supplemented with a luminosity-dependent bolometric correction and an absorbing column distribution. Differently from most previous semi-analytic and numerical models for black hole growth, we do not assume any specific distribution of Eddington ratios, rather we determine it empirically by coupling the mass and luminosity functions and a set of fundamental relations between observables in the three accretion modes. SMBH always show a very broad accretion rate distribution, and we discuss the profound consequences of this fact for our understanding of observed AGN fractions in galaxies, as well as for the empirical determination of SMBH mass functions with large surveys. We confirm previous results and clearly demonstrate that, at least for z≲ 1.5, SMBH mass function evolves antihierarchically, i.e. the most massive holes grew earlier and faster than less massive ones. For the first time, we find hints of a reversal of such a downsizing behaviour at redshifts above the peak of the black hole accretion rate density (z≈ 2). We also derive tight constraints on the (mass-weighted) average radiative efficiency of AGN: under the simplifying assumption that the mass density of both high redshift (z∼ 5) and ‘wandering’ black holes ejected from galactic nuclei after merger events are negligible compared to the local mass density, we find that 0.065 < ξ0〈εrad〉 < 0.07, where ξ0 is the local SMBH mass density in units of 4.3 × 105M⊙ Mpc−3. We trace the cosmological evolution of the kinetic luminosity function of AGN, and find that the overall efficiency of SMBH in converting accreted rest mass energy into kinetic power, εkin, ranges between εkin≃ (3–5) × 10−3, depending on the choice of the radio core luminosity function. Such a ‘kinetic efficiency’ varies however strongly with SMBH mass and redshift, being maximal for very massive holes at late times, as required for the AGN feedback by many galaxy formation models in cosmological contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei
Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. (1995) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/133630 · Cited by 4,868
A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies
Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312838 · Cited by 4,417
The Demography of Massive Dark Objects in Galaxy Centers
Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Gebhardt, K., Green, R., Grillmair, C., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300353 · Cited by 4,007
Croton, D. J., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., De Lucia, G., Frenk, C. S., Gao, L., Jenkins, A., Kauffmann, G., Navarro, J. F., & Yoshida, N. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x · Cited by 3,685
A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., et al. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312840 · Cited by 3,671
Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies
Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03335 · Cited by 3,353
The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/341002 · Cited by 2,617
Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation
Bower, R. G., Benson, A. J., Malbon, R., Helly, J. C., Frenk, C. S., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., & Lacey, C. G. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10519.x · Cited by 2,464
X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,409
A Relationship Between Nuclear Black Hole Mass And Galaxy Velocity Dispersion
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C. J., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., et al. (2000) · Cited by 2,108
Cited by
Formation of supermassive black holes
Volonteri, M. (2010) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x · Cited by 783
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y · Cited by 609
AGN wind scaling relations and the co-evolution of black holes and galaxies
Fiore, F., Feruglio, C., Shankar, F., Bischetti, M., Bongiorno, A., Brusa, M., Carniani, S., Cicone, C., Duras, F., Lamastra, A., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629478 · Cited by 601
Cosmological simulations of black hole growth: AGN luminosities and downsizing
Hirschmann, M., Dolag, K., Saro, A., Bachmann, L., Borgani, S., & Burkert, A. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1023 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Merloni, A., & Heinz, S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- ???-???
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1990046772
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 134
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A synthesis model for AGN evolution: supermassive black holes growth and feedback modes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13472.x
- The paper
- Merloni, A., & Heinz, S. (2008). A synthesis model for AGN evolution: supermassive black holes growth and feedback modes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13472.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.