The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scale-dependent bias induced by local non-Gaussianity: a comparison to N-body simulations
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the effect of primordial non-Gaussianity of the local f_NL type on the auto- and cross-power spectrum of dark matter haloes using simulations of the LCDM cosmology. We perform a series of large N-body simulations of both positive and negative f_NL, spanning the range between 10 and 100. Theoretical models predict a scale-dependent bias correction Δb(k,f_NL) that depends on the linear halo bias b(M). We measure the power spectra for a range of halo mass and redshifts covering the relevant range of existing galaxy and quasar populations. We show that auto and cross-correlation analyses of bias are consistent with each other. We find that for low wavenumbers with k<0.03 h/Mpc the theory and the simulations agree well with each other for biased haloes with b(M)>1.5. We show that a scale-independent bias correction improves the comparison between theory and simulations on smaller scales, where the scale-dependent effect rapidly becomes negligible. The current limits on f_NL from Slosar et al. (2008) come mostly from very large scales k<0.01 h/Mpc and, therefore, remain valid. For the halo samples with b(M)<1.5-2 we find that the scale- dependent bias from non-Gaussianity actually exceeds the theoretical predictions. Our results are consistent with the bias correction scaling linearly with f_NL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
DBI in the sky: Non-Gaussianity from inflation with a speed limit
Alishahiha, M., Silverstein, E., & Tong, D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123505 · Cited by 1,064
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.123514 · Cited by 830
Extracting Primordial Non-Gaussianity without Cosmic Variance
Seljak, U. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.021302 · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Cited by
Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Self-citationConstraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity from 800 000 Photometric Quasars
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., & Roth, N. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.221301 · Cited by 119
Mana, A., Giannantonio, T., Weller, J., Hoyle, B., Hutsi, G., & Sartoris, B. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1062 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Desjacques, V., Seljak, U., & Iliev, I. T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-06-11
- Volume
- 396
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-96
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1985559124
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale-dependent bias induced by local non-Gaussianity: a comparison to N-body simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14721.x
- The paper
- Desjacques, V., Seljak, U., & Iliev, I. T. (2009). Scale-dependent bias induced by local non-Gaussianity: a comparison to N-body simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14721.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.