The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale non-Gaussian mass function and halo bias: tests on N-body simulations
Open accessAbstract
The description of the abundance and clustering of haloes for non-Gaussian initial conditions has recently received renewed interest, motivated by the forthcoming large galaxy and cluster surveys, which can potentially yield constraints of the order of unity on the non-Gaussianity parameter fNL. We present tests on N-body simulations of analytical formulae describing the halo abundance and clustering for non-Gaussian initial conditions. We calibrate the analytic non-Gaussian mass function of Matarrese, Verde & Jimenez and LoVerde et al. and the analytic description of clustering of haloes for non-Gaussian initial conditions on N-body simulations. We find an excellent agreement between the simulations and the analytic predictions if we make the corrections and , where q≃ 0.75, in the density threshold for gravitational collapse and in the non-Gaussian fractional correction to the halo bias, respectively. We discuss the implications of this correction on present and forecasted primordial non-Gaussianity constraints. We confirm that the non-Gaussian halo bias offers a robust and highly competitive test of primordial non-Gaussianity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.123514 · Cited by 830
Extracting Primordial Non-Gaussianity without Cosmic Variance
Seljak, U. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.021302 · Cited by 354
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citationKravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossi, M., Verde, L., Carbone, C., Dolag, K., Branchini, E., Iannuzzi, F., Matarrese, S., & Moscardini, L.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 398
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 321-332
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2098977458
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale non-Gaussian mass function and halo bias: tests on N-body simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15150.x
- The paper
- Grossi, M., Verde, L., Carbone, C., Dolag, K., Branchini, E., Iannuzzi, F., Matarrese, S., & Moscardini, L. (2009). Large-scale non-Gaussian mass function and halo bias: tests on N-body simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15150.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.