The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Galaxies���intergalactic medium interaction calculation ��� I. Galaxy formation as a function of large-scale environment
Open accessAbstract
We present the first results of hydrodynamical simulations that follow the formation of galaxies to the present day in nearly spherical regions of radius ∼20 h−1 Mpc drawn from the Millennium Simulation (Springel et al.). The regions have mean overdensities that deviate by (−2, −1, 0, +1, +2)σ from the cosmic mean, where σ is the rms mass fluctuation on a scale of ∼20 h−1 Mpc at z= 1.5. The simulations have mass resolution of up to ∼106h−1 M⊙, cover the entire range of large-scale cosmological environments, including rare objects such as massive clusters and sparse voids, and allow extrapolation of statistics to the (500 h−1 Mpc)3 Millennium Simulation volume as a whole. They include gas cooling, photoheating from an imposed ionizing background, supernova feedback and galactic winds, but no AGN. In this paper, we focus on the star formation properties of the model. We find that the specific star formation rate density at z≲ 10 varies systematically from region to region by up to an order of magnitude, but the global value, averaged over all volumes, closely reproduces observational data. Massive, compact galaxies, similar to those observed in the GOODS fields (Wiklind et al.), form in the overdense regions as early as z= 6, but do not appear in the underdense regions until z∼ 3. These environmental variations are not caused by a dependence of the star formation properties on environment, but rather by a strong variation of the halo mass function from one environment to another, with more massive haloes forming preferentially in the denser regions. At all epochs, stars form most efficiently in haloes of circular velocity vc∼ 250 km s−1. However, the star formation history exhibits a form of ‘downsizing’ (even in the absence of AGN feedback): the stars comprising massive galaxies at z= 0 have mostly formed by z= 1−2, whilst those comprising smaller galaxies typically form at later times. However, additional feedback is required to limit star formation in massive galaxies at late times.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Self-citationCore condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
Self-citation
Cited by
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058 · Cited by 3,601
Self-citationSimulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationThe EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations
Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv725 · Cited by 1,451
Self-citationGalactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Self-citationDark matter and cosmic structure
Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2012) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201200212 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crain, R. A., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Eke, V. R., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., Kay, S. T., Peacock, J. A., Pearce, F. R., Schaye, J., Springel, V., Thomas, P. A., White, S. D. M., Wiersma, R. P. C., & The Virgo Consortium
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-11
- Volume
- 399
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1773-1794
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2086103540
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galaxies���intergalactic medium interaction calculation ��� I. Galaxy formation as a function of large-scale environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15402.x
- The paper
- Crain, R. A., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Eke, V. R., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., Kay, S. T., Peacock, J. A., Pearce, F. R., Schaye, J., Springel, V., Thomas, P. A., White, S. D. M., Wiersma, R. P. C., & The Virgo Consortium. (2009). Galaxies���intergalactic medium interaction calculation ��� I. Galaxy formation as a function of large-scale environment. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15402.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.