Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The unusual X-ray emission of the short Swift GRB 090515: evidence for the formation of a magnetar?: The unusual X-ray emission of GRB 090515

Open access
Rowlinson, A., O'Brien, P. T., Tanvir, N. R., Zhang, B., Evans, P. A., Lyons, N., Levan, A. J., Willingale, R., Page, K. L., Onal, O., Burrows, D. N., Beardmore, A. P., Ukwatta, T. N., Berger, E., Hjorth, J., Fruchter, A. S., Tunnicliffe, R. L., Fox, D. B., Cucchiara, A.·2010·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The majority of short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) are thought to originate from the merger of compact binary systems collapsing directly to form a black hole. However, it has been proposed that both SGRBs and long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) may, on rare occasions, form an unstable millisecond pulsar (magnetar) prior to final collapse. GRB 090515, detected by the Swift satellite was extremely short, with a T90 of 0.036 ± 0.016 s, and had a very low fluence of 2 × 10−8 erg cm−2 and faint optical afterglow. Despite this, the 0.3–10 keV flux in the first 200 s was the highest observed for an SGRB by the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The X-ray light curve showed an unusual plateau and steep decay, becoming undetectable after ∼500 s. This behaviour is similar to that observed in some long bursts proposed to have magnetars contributing to their emission. In this paper, we present the Swift observations of GRB 090515 and compare it to other gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in the Swift sample. Additionally, we present optical observations from Gemini, which detected an afterglow of magnitude 26.4 ± 0.1 at T+ 1.7 h after the burst. We discuss potential causes of the unusual 0.3–10 keV emission and suggest it might be energy injection from an unstable millisecond pulsar. Using the duration and flux of the plateau of GRB 090515, we place constraints on the millisecond pulsar spin period and magnetic field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17354.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Rowlinson, A., O'Brien, P. T., Tanvir, N. R., Zhang, B., Evans, P. A., Lyons, N., Levan, A. J., Willingale, R., Page, K. L., Onal, O., Burrows, D. N., Beardmore, A. P., Ukwatta, T. N., Berger, E., Hjorth, J., Fruchter, A. S., Tunnicliffe, R. L., Fox, D. B., & Cucchiara, A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2010-10-05
Volume
409
Issue
2
Pages
531-540
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1935672049
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unusual X-ray emission of the short Swift GRB 090515: evidence for the formation of a magnetar?: The unusual X-ray emission of GRB 090515. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17354.x
The paper
Rowlinson, A., O'Brien, P. T., Tanvir, N. R., Zhang, B., Evans, P. A., Lyons, N., Levan, A. J., Willingale, R., Page, K. L., Onal, O., Burrows, D. N., Beardmore, A. P., Ukwatta, T. N., Berger, E., Hjorth, J., Fruchter, A. S., Tunnicliffe, R. L., Fox, D. B., & Cucchiara, A. (2010). The unusual X-ray emission of the short Swift GRB 090515: evidence for the formation of a magnetar?: The unusual X-ray emission of GRB 090515. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17354.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.