The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9: WiggleZ Survey: growth of structure
Open accessAbstract
We present precise measurements of the growth rate of cosmic structure for the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.9, using redshift-space distortions in the galaxy power spectrum of the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. Our results, which have a precision of around 10 per cent in four independent redshift bins, are well fitted by a flat Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model with matter density parameter Ωm= 0.27. Our analysis hence indicates that this model provides a self-consistent description of the growth of cosmic structure through large-scale perturbations and the homogeneous cosmic expansion mapped by supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations. We achieve robust results by systematically comparing our data with several different models of the quasi-linear growth of structure including empirical models, fitting formulae calibrated to N-body simulations, and perturbation theory techniques. We extract the first measurements of the power spectrum of the velocity divergence field, Pθθ(k), as a function of redshift (under the assumption that , where g is the galaxy overdensity field), and demonstrate that the WiggleZ galaxy–mass cross-correlation is consistent with a deterministic (rather than stochastic) scale-independent bias model for WiggleZ galaxies for scales k < 0.3 h Mpc−1. Measurements of the cosmic growth rate from the WiggleZ Survey and other current and future observations offer a powerful test of the physical nature of dark energy that is complementary to distance–redshift measures such as supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample
Percival, W. J., Reid, B. A., Eisenstein, D. J., Bahcall, N. A., Budavari, T., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G. R., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15812.x · Cited by 1,846 · cited 2×
“In addition to providing a good description of the temperature and polarization fluctuations in the CMB, this model yields a good fit to distance measurements from supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations (Guy et al. 2010, Percival et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodA test of the nature of cosmic acceleration using galaxy redshift distortions
Guzzo, L., Pierleoni, M., Meneux, B., Branchini, E., Le Fèvre, O., Marinoni, C., Garilli, B., Blaizot, J., De Lucia, G., Pollo, A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06555 · Cited by 654
SYSTEMATIC EFFECTS ON DETERMINATION OF THE GROWTH FACTOR FROM REDSHIFT-SPACE DISTORTIONS
Okumura, T., & Jing, Y. P. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/726/1/5 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Poole, G. B., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x · Cited by 506
Self-citationTesting general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
MEASUREMENT OF 21 cm BRIGHTNESS FLUCTUATIONS AT z ∼ 0.8 IN CROSS-CORRELATION
Masui, K. W., Switzer, E. R., Banavar, N., Bandura, K., Blake, C., Calin, L.-M., Chang, T.-C., Chen, X., Li, Y.-C., Liao, Y.-W., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/l20 · Cited by 344
Self-citationGil-Marín, H., Bautista, J. E., Paviot, R., Vargas-Magaña, M., de la Torre, S., Fromenteau, S., Alam, S., Ávila, S., Burtin, E., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2455 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, C., Brough, S., Colless, M., Contreras, C., Couch, W., Croom, S., Davis, T., Drinkwater, M. J., Forster, K., Gilbank, D., Gladders, M., Glazebrook, K., Jelliffe, B., Jurek, R. J., Li, I.-H., Madore, B., Martin, D. C., Pimbblet, K., Poole, G. B., Pracy, M., Sharp, R., Wisnioski, E., Woods, D., Wyder, T. K., & Yee, H. K. C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-07
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2876-2891
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1909903278
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 26.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9: WiggleZ Survey: growth of structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18903.x
- The paper
- Blake, C., Brough, S., Colless, M., Contreras, C., Couch, W., Croom, S., Davis, T., Drinkwater, M. J., Forster, K., Gilbank, D., Gladders, M., Glazebrook, K., Jelliffe, B., Jurek, R. J., Li, I.-H., Madore, B., Martin, D. C., Pimbblet, K., Poole, G. B., . . . Yee, H. K. C. (2011). The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9: WiggleZ Survey: growth of structure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18903.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.