Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate and σ8: 6dFGS: z≈ 0 measurements of fσ8 and σ8

Open access
Beutler, Florian, Blake, Chris, Colless, Matthew, Jones, D. Heath, Staveley-Smith, Lister, Poole, Gregory B., Campbell, Lachlan, Parker, Quentin, Saunders, Will, Watson, Fred·2012·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of redshift-space distortions in the two-point correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS). The K-band selected sub-sample which we employ in this study contains 81971 galaxies distributed over 17000deg^2 with an effective redshift z = 0.067. By modelling the 2D galaxy correlation function, xi(r_p,pi), we measure the parameter combination f(z)sigma_8(z) = 0.423 +/- 0.055. Alternatively, by assuming standard gravity we can break the degeneracy between sigma_8 and the galaxy bias parameter, b. Combining our data with the Hubble constant prior from Riess et al (2011), we measure sigma_8 = 0.76 +/- 0.11 and Omega_m = 0.250 +/- 0.022, consistent with constraints from other galaxy surveys and the Cosmic Microwave Background data from WMAP7. Combining our measurement of fsigma_8 with WMAP7 allows us to test the relationship between matter and gravity on cosmic scales by constraining the growth index of density fluctuations, gamma. Using only 6dFGS and WMAP7 data we find gamma = 0.547 +/- 0.088, consistent with the prediction of General Relativity. We note that because of the low effective redshift of 6dFGS our measurement of the growth rate is independent of the fiducial cosmological model (Alcock-Paczynski effect). We also show that our conclusions are not sensitive to the model adopted for non-linear redshift-space distortions. Using a Fisher matrix analysis we report predictions for constraints on fsigma_8 for the WALLABY survey and the proposed TAIPAN survey. The WALLABY survey will be able to measure fsigma_8 with a precision of 4-10%, depending on the modelling of non-linear structure formation. This is comparable to the predicted precision for the best redshift bins of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), demonstrating that low-redshift surveys have a significant role to play in future tests of dark energy and modified gravity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Poole, G. B., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
423
Issue
4
Pages
3430-3444
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1938366638
Cited by
506
References
99
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate and σ8: 6dFGS: z≈ 0 measurements of fσ8 and σ8. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x
The paper
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Poole, G. B., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2012). The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate and σ8: 6dFGS: z≈ 0 measurements of fσ8 and σ8. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.