The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of the interstellar medium of star-forming galaxies: Stellar feedback and the ISM
Open accessAbstract
We develop and implement numerical methods for including stellar feedback in galaxy‐scale numerical simulations. Our models include simplified treatments of heating by Type I and Type II supernovae, gas recycling from young stars and asymptotic giant branch winds, heating from the shocked stellar winds, H ii photoionization heating and radiation pressure from stellar photons. The energetics and time dependence associated with the feedback are taken directly from stellar evolution models. We implement these stellar feedback models in smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations with pc‐scale resolution, modelling galaxies from Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) like dwarfs and Milky Way (MW) analogues to massive z∼ 2 star‐forming discs. In the absence of stellar feedback, gas cools rapidly and collapses without limit into dense sub‐units, inconsistent with observations. By contrast, in all cases with feedback, the interstellar medium (ISM) quickly approaches a statistical steady state in which giant molecular clouds (GMCs) continuously form, disperse and re‐form, leading to a multiphase ISM. In this paper, we quantify the properties of the ISM and GMCs in this self‐regulated state. In a companion paper we study the galactic winds driven by stellar feedback. Our primary results on the structure of the ISM in star‐forming galaxies include the following. Star‐forming galaxies generically self‐regulate so that the cool, dense gas maintains Toomre’s Q∼ 1. Most of the volume is occupied by relatively diffuse hot gas, while most of the mass is in dense GMC complexes created by self‐gravity. The phase structure of the gas and the gas mass fraction at high densities are much more sensitive probes of the physics of stellar feedback than integrated quantities such as the Toomre Q or gas velocity dispersion. Different stellar feedback mechanisms act on different spatial (and density) scales. Radiation pressure and H ii gas pressure are critical for preventing runaway collapse of dense gas in GMCs. Shocked supernova ejecta and stellar winds dominate the dynamics of the volume‐filling hot gas. However, this gas primarily vents out of the star‐forming disc and contributes only modestly to the mid‐plane ISM pressure. The galaxy‐averaged star formation rate is determined by feedback, with different mechanisms dominating in different galaxy types. For a given feedback efficiency, restricting star formation to molecular gas or modifying the cooling function has little effect on the star formation rate in the galaxies we model (including an SMC‐mass dwarf). By contrast, changing the feedback mechanisms or assumed feedback efficiencies directly translates to shifts off of the observed Kennicutt–Schmidt relation. Self‐gravity leads to GMCs with an approximately self‐similar mass function ∝M−2, with a high‐mass cut‐off determined by the characteristic Jeans/Toomre mass of the system. In all of our galaxy models, GMCs live for a few dynamical times before they are disrupted by stellar feedback. The net star formation efficiency in GMCs ranges from ∼1 per cent in dwarfs and MW‐like spirals to nearly ∼10 per cent in gas‐rich rapidly star‐forming galaxies. GMCs are approximately virialized, but there is a large dispersion in the virial parameter for a given GMC mass, and lower mass GMCs tend to be preferentially unbound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082 · cited 1×
“3251 n−0.160 P̃ −0.2004 pc (1) (Chevalier & Gardner 1974; McKee & Ostriker 1977), where E51 = E/1051 erg, n0 is the density in CGS, and P̃04 = 10−4 P/[erg cm−3] k−1B , intended to reflect the radius of the energy-conserving (Sedov) phase of the blastwave (often much larger than our softening…”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation
Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Torrey, P., & Puchwein, E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2 · Cited by 614
The Auriga Project: the properties and formation mechanisms of disc galaxies across cosmic time
Grand, R. J. J., Gómez, F. A., Marinacci, F., Pakmor, R., Springel, V., Campbell, D. J. R., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., & White, S. D. M. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx071 · Cited by 557
Cusp-core transformations in dwarf galaxies: observational predictions
Teyssier, R., Pontzen, A., Dubois, Y., & Read, J. I. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts563 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-16
- Volume
- 421
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3488-3521
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1925826255
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of the interstellar medium of star-forming galaxies: Stellar feedback and the ISM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20578.x
- The paper
- Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. (2012). The structure of the interstellar medium of star-forming galaxies: Stellar feedback and the ISM. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20578.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.