The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with future galaxy surveys: Primordial non-Gaussianity with galaxy surveys
Open accessAbstract
We study the constraining power on primordial non-Gaussianity of future surveys of the large-scale structure of the Universe for both near-term surveys (such as the Dark Energy Survey – DES) as well as longer term projects such as Euclid and WFIRST. Specifically we perform a Fisher matrix analysis forecast for such surveys, using DES-like and Euclid-like configurations as examples, and take account of any expected photometric and spectroscopic data. We focus on two-point statistics and consider three observables: the 3D galaxy power spectrum in redshift space, the angular galaxy power spectrum and the projected weak-lensing shear power spectrum. We study the effects of adding a few extra parameters to the basic Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) set. We include the two standard parameters to model the current value for the dark-energy equation of state and its time derivative, w0, wa, and we account for the possibility of primordial non-Gaussianity of the local, equilateral and orthogonal types, of parameter fNL and, optionally, of spectral index . We present forecasted constraints on these parameters using the different observational probes. We show that accounting for models that include primordial non-Gaussianity does not degrade the constraint on the standard ΛCDM set nor on the dark-energy equation of state. By combining the weak-lensing data and the information on projected galaxy clustering, consistently including all two-point functions and their covariance, we find forecasted marginalized errors σ(fNL) ∼ 3, from a Euclid-like survey for the local shape of primordial non-Gaussianity, while the orthogonal and equilateral constraints are weakened for the galaxy clustering case, due to the weaker scale dependence of the bias. In the lensing case, the constraints remain instead similar in all configurations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×
“We have assumed the analytical description by Navarro et al. (1996, 1997) for the halo density profile of dark matter haloes (NFW).”
MethodLewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.123514 · Cited by 830
Review of Local Non‐Gaussianity from Multifield Inflation
Byrnes, C. T., & Choi, K.-Y. (2010) · Advances in Astronomy · doi:10.1155/2010/724525 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citationDesjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Baumann, D., & McAllister, L. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316105733 · Cited by 532
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
Kilbinger, M., Fu, L., Heymans, C., Simpson, F., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Harnois-Déraps, J., Hoekstra, H., Hildebrandt, H., Kitching, T. D., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt041 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Giannantonio, T., Porciani, C., Carron, J., Amara, A., & Pillepich, A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-25
- Volume
- 422
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2854-2877
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1954281648
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with future galaxy surveys: Primordial non-Gaussianity with galaxy surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20604.x
- The paper
- Giannantonio, T., Porciani, C., Carron, J., Amara, A., & Pillepich, A. (2012). Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with future galaxy surveys: Primordial non-Gaussianity with galaxy surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20604.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.