Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Co‐expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats

USADEL, BJÖRN, OBAYASHI, TAKESHI, MUTWIL, MAREK, GIORGI, FEDERICO M., BASSEL, GEORGE W., TANIMOTO, MIMI, CHOW, AMANDA, STEINHAUSER, DIRK, PERSSON, STAFFAN, PROVART, NICHOLAS J.·2009·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Gene co‐expression analysis has emerged in the past 5 years as a powerful tool for gene function prediction. In essence, co‐expression analysis asks the question ‘what are the genes that are co‐expressed, that is, those that show similar expression profiles across many experiments, with my gene of interest?’. Genes that are highly co‐expressed may be involved in the biological process or processes of the query gene. This review describes the tools that are available for performing such analyses, how each of these perform, and also discusses statistical issues including how normalization of gene expression data can influence co‐expression results, calculation of co‐expression scores and P values, and the influence of data sets used for co‐expression analysis. Finally, examples from the literature will be presented, wherein co‐expression has been used to corroborate and discover various aspects of plant biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02040.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
USADEL, B., OBAYASHI, T., MUTWIL, M., GIORGI, F. M., BASSEL, G. W., TANIMOTO, M., CHOW, A., STEINHAUSER, D., PERSSON, S., & PROVART, N. J.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-05
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1633-1651
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W1995869668
Cited by
476
References
67
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co‐expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02040.x
The paper
USADEL, B., OBAYASHI, T., MUTWIL, M., GIORGI, F. M., BASSEL, G. W., TANIMOTO, M., CHOW, A., STEINHAUSER, D., PERSSON, S., & PROVART, N. J. (2009). Co‐expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02040.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.