Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,728

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation

Walter, Michael, Chaban, Christina, Schütze, Katia, Batistic, Oliver, Weckermann, Katrin, Näke, Christian, Blazevic, Dragica, Grefen, Christopher, Schumacher, Karin, Oecking, Claudia, Harter, Klaus, Kudla, Jörg·2004·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Dynamic networks of protein–protein interactions regulate numerous cellular processes and determine the ability to respond appropriately to environmental stimuli. However, the investigation of protein complex formation in living plant cells by methods such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer has remained experimentally difficult, time consuming and requires sophisticated technical equipment. Here, we report the implementation of a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) technique for visualization of protein–protein interactions in plant cells. This approach relies on the formation of a fluorescent complex by two non‐fluorescent fragments of the yellow fluorescent protein brought together by association of interacting proteins fused to these fragments ( Hu et al. , 2002 ). To enable BiFC analyses in plant cells, we generated different complementary sets of expression vectors, which enable protein interaction studies in transiently or stably transformed cells. These vectors were used to investigate and visualize homodimerization of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor bZIP63 and the zinc finger protein lesion simulating disease 1 (LSD1) from Arabidopsis as well as the dimer formation of the tobacco 14‐3‐3 protein T14‐3c. The interaction analyses of these model proteins established the feasibility of BiFC analyses for efficient visualization of structurally distinct proteins in different cellular compartments. Our investigations revealed a remarkable signal fluorescence intensity of interacting protein complexes as well as a high reproducibility and technical simplicity of the method in different plant systems. Consequently, the BiFC approach should significantly facilitate the visualization of the subcellular sites of protein interactions under conditions that closely reflect the normal physiological environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02219.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,728

Metadata

Authors
Walter, M., Chaban, C., Schütze, K., Batistic, O., Weckermann, K., Näke, C., Blazevic, D., Grefen, C., Schumacher, K., Oecking, C., Harter, K., & Kudla, J.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09-14
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
428-438
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2123058210
Cited by
1,728
References
0
FWCI
21.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02219.x
The paper
Walter, M., Chaban, C., Schütze, K., Batistic, O., Weckermann, K., Näke, C., Blazevic, D., Grefen, C., Schumacher, K., Oecking, C., Harter, K., & Kudla, J. (2004). Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02219.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.