Cited by 44Hair Growth and DisordersSkin and Cellular Biology Researchmelanin and skin pigmentation

The canine hair cycle – a guide for the assessment of morphological and immunohistochemical criteria

Open access
Müntener, Tabitha, Doherr, Marcus G., Guscetti, Franco, Suter, Maja M., Welle, Monika M.·2011·Veterinary Dermatology

Abstract

The hair follicle has a lifelong capacity to cycle through recurrent phases of controlled growth (anagen), regression (catagen) and quiescence (telogen), each associated with specific morphological changes. A comprehensive classification scheme is available for mice to distinguish the cycle stages anagen I-VI, catagen I-VIII and telogen. For dogs, such a classification system does not exist, although alopecia associated with hair cycle arrest is common. We applied analogous morphological criteria and various staining techniques to subdivide the canine hair cycle stages to the same extent as has been done in mice. Of all the staining techniques applied, haematoxylin and eosin stain, Sacpic, Masson Fontana and immunohistochemistry for vimentin and laminin proved to be most useful. To evaluate the applicability of our criteria, we investigated skin biopsies from healthy beagle dogs (n=20; biopsies from shoulder and thigh) kept in controlled conditions. From each biopsy, at least 50 hair follicles were assessed. Statistical analysis revealed that 30% of the follicles were in anagen (12% early and 18% late), 8% in catagen (2% early, 5% late and 1% not determinable) and 27% in telogen. Thirty-five per cent of hair follicles could not be assigned to a specific cycle stage because not all follicles within one biopsy were oriented perfectly. In conclusion, this guide will not only be helpful for the investigation of alopecic disorders and possibly their pathogenesis, but may also serv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.00963.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müntener, T., Doherr, M. G., Guscetti, F., Suter, M. M., & Welle, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Welle, Monika M.
Venue
Veterinary Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-14
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
383-395
ISSN
  • 0959-4493 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3164
OpenAlex
W1596237853
Cited by
43
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
hair follicle, anagen, catagen, telogen, hair loss, vimentin, laminin, immunohistochemistry, H&E staining, beagle dogs, skin biopsy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, Dogs, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Staining and Labeling, Hair Follicle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review