Cited by 50Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatologic Treatments and ResearchPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Acne treatment by methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy with red light vs. intense pulsed light

Hong, Jong Soo, Jung, Jae Yoon, Yoon, Ji Young, Suh, Dae Hun·2013·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Various methods of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for acne have been introduced. However, comparative studies among them are still needed. We performed this study to compare the effect of methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) PDT for acne between red light and intense pulsed light (IPL). Twenty patients were enrolled in this eight‐week, prospective, split‐face study. We applied MAL cream over the whole face with a three‐hour incubation time. Then patients were irradiated with 22 J/cm 2 of red light on one‐half of the face and 8–10 J/cm 2 of IPL on the other half during each treatment session. We performed three treatment sessions at two‐week intervals and followed‐up patients until four weeks after the last session. Inflammatory and non‐inflammatory acne lesions were reduced significantly on both sides. The red light side showed a better response than the IPL side after the first treatment. Serious adverse effects after treatment were not observed. MAL‐PDT with red light and IPL are both an effective and safe modality in acne treatment. Red light showed a faster response time than IPL. After multiple sessions, both light sources demonstrated satisfactory results. We suggest that reducing the total dose of red light is desirable when performing MAL‐PDT in Asian patients with acne compared with Caucasians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05673.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, J. S., Jung, J. Y., Yoon, J. Y., & Suh, D. H.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Suh, Dae Hun
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-09
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
614-619
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W1962923008
Cited by
50
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
acne, methyl aminolevulinate, photodynamic therapy, red light, intense pulsed light, split-face comparison, inflammatory acne lesions, non-inflammatory acne lesions, treatment response time, adverse effects, Asian patients
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adult, Aminolevulinic Acid, Color, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Photochemotherapy, Photosensitizing Agents, Young Adult, Intense Pulsed Light Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review