Cited by 47Mental Health and Patient InvolvementCommunity Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation Science

Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey

Open access
Barber, Rosemary, Boote, Jonathan D., Cooper, Cindy L.·2007·Health Expectations

Abstract

Objectives To investigate how far and in what way consumers are involved in NHS research. Background There is guidance from the UK Department of Health on involving consumers in research, but it is not known how these policies have been implemented. Design A national postal survey was conducted of 884 researchers selected randomly from the National Research Register, 16 researchers registered on the INVOLVE database and 15 consumers nominated by researchers who collaborated in the same research projects. Setting The survey participants were drawn from diverse settings including NHS organizations and universities. Participants Researchers and consumers collaborating in the same projects. Main outcome measures Details of how consumers were involved and the number of projects that met previously developed consensus‐derived indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. Results Of the 900 researchers who were sent a postal questionnaire, 518 responded, giving a response rate of 58%. Nine of the 15 consumers responded. Eighty‐eight (17%) researchers reported involving consumers, mainly as members of a project steering group, designing research instruments and/or planning or designing the research methods. Most projects met between one and four indicators. Conclusions This national survey revealed that only a small proportion of NHS researchers were actively involving consumers. This study provides a useful marker of how far the Department of Health’s policy on consumer involvement in NHS research has been implemented and in what way.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00457.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chambers R, OÕBrien LM, Linnell S, Sharp S. Why donÕt health researchers report consumer involve- ment?. Quality in Primary Care, 2004; 12: 151-157.
  2. Faulkner A. The Ethics of Survivor Research. Bristol: Published for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation by the Policy Press, 2004.
  3. Consumer involvement in health research, R Barber et al. Ó 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health Expectations, 10, pp.380-391

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barber, R., Boote, J. D., & Cooper, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Health Expectations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-31
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
380-391
ISSN
  • 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-7625
OpenAlex
W2152204228
Cited by
47
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
consumer involvement in research, patient and public involvement, NHS research, research policy implementation, research design, Department of Health guidance, researcher attitudes
MeSH terms
Community Participation, United Kingdom, Humans, National Health Programs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review