The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as treatment of atopic dermatitis in infancy
Abstract
Background: Some studies have suggested that supplementation of food with lactobacilli may prevent or improve atopic dermatitis in children. This study was designed to investigate the therapeutic effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as a food supplement in infants suffering from atopic dermatitis. Methods: Infants aged 3–12 months suffering from mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis (severity scoring of atopic dermatitis or SCORAD index of 15–40) without current antiinflammatory treatment were randomized to receive LGG (5 × 10 9 colony forming units b.i.d.) or placebo as a food supplement for 12 weeks. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis index and use of hydrocortisone 1% ointment as rescue medication (2 points per application) were recorded at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment and combined as symptom load (SL). Results: Fifty‐four infants (LGG group, mean ± SD SCORAD index 24.6 ± 8.8) and 48 infants (placebo group, SCORAD index 23.6 ± 7.8) were randomized and completed the treatment period (intention‐to‐treat analysis). Symptom load generally improved over time at 4 weeks (LGG vs placebo, 23.8 ± 12.4 vs 20.6 ± 9.9), 8 weeks (22.5 ± 14.6 vs 17.9 ± 13.1), and 12 weeks (19.6 ± 15.4 vs 15.1 ± 12.1), without statistically significant group differences. When stratified for age, eczema severity or use of rescue medication, no statistically significant group differences, in improvement, were found. No significant group differences were found for the use of rescue medication (0.8 ± 45.0 g vs 3.5 ± 29.8 g), increase in mean logarithmic total serum IgE (0.17 ± 0.30 kU/l vs 0.26 ± 0.45 kU/l), and newly developed allergic sensitization against hen’s egg or cow’s milk (18.8%vs 10.0%). Conclusion: This placebo‐controlled trial showed no therapeutic effect of LGG against mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis in infancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolvers, D., Antoine, J.-M., Myllyluoma, E., Schrezenmeir, J., Szajewska, H., & Rijkers, G. T. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.109.113753 · Cited by 268
Evangelista, M. T. P., Abad-Casintahan, F., & Lopez-Villafuerte, L. (2014) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.12339 · Cited by 180
Probiotics for the prevention of respiratory tract infections: a systematic review
Vouloumanou, E. K., Makris, G. C., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., & Falagas, M. E. (2009) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.11.005 · Cited by 131
A randomized trial of Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP 133 for the treatment of atopic dermatitis
Han, Y., Kim, B., Ban, J., Lee, J., Kim, B. J., Choi, B. S., Hwang, S., Ahn, K., & Kim, J. (2012) · Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1111/pai.12010 · Cited by 127
Health effects of probiotics on the skin
Roudsari, M. R., Karimi, R., Sohrabvandi, S., & Mortazavian, A. M. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.680078 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Grüber, C., Wendt, M., Sulser, C., Lau, S., Kulig, M., Wahn, U., Werfel, T., & Niggemann, B.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1270-1276
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2022146913
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as treatment of atopic dermatitis in infancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01543.x
- The paper
- Grüber, C., Wendt, M., Sulser, C., Lau, S., Kulig, M., Wahn, U., Werfel, T., & Niggemann, B. (2007). Randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as treatment of atopic dermatitis in infancy. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01543.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.