Cited by 268Probiotics and Fermented FoodsFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchInfant Nutrition and Health

Guidance for substantiating the evidence for beneficial effects of probiotics: prevention and management of infections by probiotics

Open access
Wolvers, Danielle, Antoine, Jean-Michel, Myllyluoma, Eveliina, Schrezenmeir, Juergen, Szajewska, Hania, Rijkers, Ger T.·2010·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The rationale for the use of probiotics in the management of infectious diseases is supported by their potential to influence and stabilize the composition of gut microbiota, enhance colonization resistance, and modulate immune function parameters. A literature review was conducted to determine the efficacy of using probiotics in selected infections: 1) infectious diarrhea in infants and children, 2) traveler's diarrhea, 3) necrotizing enterocolitis in infants, 4) Helicobacter pylori infection, 5) respiratory tract infections in adults and children, 6) ear, nose, and throat infections, and 7) infectious complications in surgical and critically ill patients. The different types of infections that have been subject to clinical studies with different probiotics obviously prevent any generic conclusions. Furthermore, the lack of consistency among studies focusing on 1 specific infection, in study design, applied probiotic strains, outcome parameters, and study population, along with the still limited number of studies, preclude clear and definite conclusions on the efficacy of probiotics and illustrate the need for better-aligned study designs and methodology. Exceptions were the management of infectious diarrhea in infants and traveler's diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Sufficient consistent data exist for these applications to conclude that certain probiotics, under certain conditions, and in certain target populations, are beneficial in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.109.113753

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Confirmation of probiotic identity, viability, and number of organisms by quantitative culture and molecular methods was done in only eight trials.

    “Confirmation of probiotic identity, viability, and number of organisms by quantitative culture and molecular methods was done in only eight trials but should be standard in research studies (Rijkers 2010; Wolvers 2010).”

    From Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea (2020) · cites this paper as Wolvers 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolvers, D., Antoine, J.-M., Myllyluoma, E., Schrezenmeir, J., Szajewska, H., & Rijkers, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Danone (France) (FR)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Max Rubner Institut (DE)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
140
Issue
3
Pages
698S-712S
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130965965
Cited by
268
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, allergy, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, hygiene hypothesis, gut microbiota, immune response, probiotic strain selection, intervention timing, allergy prevention
MeSH terms
Communicable Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Respiratory Tract Infections, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review