Cited by 87Mast cells and histamineFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

How much specific is the association between hymenoptera venom allergy and mastocytosis?

Bonadonna, P., Zanotti, R., Pagani, M., Caruso, B., Perbellini, O., Colarossi, S., Olivieri, E., Dama, A. +4 more·2009·Allergy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The preferential association of mastocytosis with hymenoptera sting reactions is well known, but there is no data on the prevalence of clonal mast cell disorders in subjects with severe systemic reactions due to foods or drugs. METHODS: Patients with food- or drug-induced severe systemic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and increased serum tryptase were studied for the presence of mastocytosis, and compared with a population of patients with hymenoptera allergy. The aetiological role of foods or drugs was assessed according to current recommendations. Systemic reactions were graded in severity according to the procedure described by Mueller. Serum tryptase was considered increased if the level was >11.4 ng/ml. Subjects with increased tryptase had dermatological evaluation and Bone marrow(BM) aspirate-biopsy, which included histology/cytology, flow cytometry and detection of KIT mutations. RESULTS: A total of 137 subjects (57 male, mean age 42 years) were studied. Of them, 86 proved positive for drugs and 51 for foods. Overall, out of 137 patients, only nine (6.6%) had a basal tryptase >11.4 ng/ml, and only two (1.5%) were diagnosed with mastocytosis. This was clearly different from patients with hymenoptera allergy, where 13.9% had elevated tryptase and 11.1% had a clonal mast cell disorder. CONCLUSION: The association of clonal mast cell disorders with hymenoptera allergy seems to be more specific than that with food- or drug-induced systemic reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02108.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonadonna, P., Zanotti, R., Pagani, M., Caruso, B., Perbellini, O., Colarossi, S., Olivieri, E., Dama, A., Schiappoli, M., Senna, G., Antico, A., & Passalacqua, G.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Passalacqua, G.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
64
Issue
9
Pages
1379-1382
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W1966508137
Cited by
87
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
hymenoptera venom allergy, mastocytosis, clonal mast cell disorders, serum tryptase, food-induced anaphylaxis, drug-induced anaphylaxis, KIT mutations, bone marrow biopsy, systemic allergic reactions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Arthropod Venoms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Hymenoptera, Hypersensitivity, Male, Mastocytosis, Middle Aged, Tryptases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review