Cited by 57Mast cells and histamineDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Drug allergy in mast cell disease

Brockow, Knut, Bonadonna, Patrizia·2012·Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mastocytosis in adults is associated with a history of anaphylaxis in 22-49%. In addition, monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome has been described presenting with anaphylaxis, especially in patients with hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis. Data on patients with drug hypersensitivity and mast cell diseases are scarce. RECENT FINDINGS: Drugs are elicitors of anaphylaxis in patients with mastocytosis. Drug hypersensitivity is only seldom described as associated with undetected mast cell disease in the literature. Together with a single-centred retrospective study, this data suggests that from all patients with drug-induced anaphylaxis, probably only a minority are associated with mast cell disease. Most of these cases in the literature are related to general anaesthesia. Thus, for patients with mastocytosis, general anaesthesia appears to be a procedure associated with risk of mast cell degranulation, and special precautions should be considered. SUMMARY: The association between immediate drug hypersensitivity and undetected mast cell diseases appears to be moderate, but nevertheless basal serum tryptase determination and examination for skin signs of mast cell disorders are recommended. An ongoing European multicenter study by the European Network for Drug Allergy will provide more information on this topic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aci.0b013e328355b7cb

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with mixed MCAS are at high risk for developing recurrent life-threatening anaphylaxis, particularly after Hymenoptera stings, and possibly after exposure to food, drugs, and other allergens.

    “thus, they are at high risk for developing recurrent life-threatening anaphylaxis, particularly after Hymenoptera stings, 23,100-102 but they might also be after exposure to food, drugs, and other allergens. 103-105”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brockow, K., & Bonadonna, P.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Brockow, Knut
Venue
Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology
Published
2012-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
354-360
ISSN
  • 1473-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-4050
OpenAlex
W2039265769
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
drug hypersensitivity, mastocytosis, drug-induced anaphylaxis, general anesthesia, mast cell degranulation, serum tryptase
MeSH terms
Adult, Anaphylaxis, Anesthesia, General, Drug Hypersensitivity, European Union, Female, Humans, Male, Mastocytosis, Retrospective Studies, Skin, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Cell Degranulation, Tryptases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review