The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Faecal SIgA secretion in infants fed on pre‐ or probiotic infant formula
Open accessAbstract
Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) plays an important role in the defence of the gastrointestinal tract. The level of faecal SIgA antibody is associated with increased neutralization and clearance of viruses. Formula‐fed infants who lack the transfer of protective maternal SIgA from breast milk may benefit from strategies to support maturation of humoral immunity and endogenous production of SIgA. We aimed at studying the effects of standard, prebiotic and probiotic infant formulas on the faecal SIgA levels. At birth, infants of whom the mother had decided not to breastfeed were allocated to one of three formula groups in a randomized, double‐blind fashion. Nineteen infants received standard infant formula; 19 received prebiotic formula containing a specific mixture of 0.6 g galacto‐oligosaccharides (GOS)/fructo‐oligosaccharides (FOS)/100 ml formula and 19 received probiotic formula containing 6.0 × 10 9 cfu Bifidobacterium animalis/100 ml formula. Faecal samples were taken on postnatal day 5, day 10, wk 4 and every 4 wk thereafter until wk 32. SIgA in faeces was determined by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. During the intervention, infants fed on prebiotic formula showed a trend towards higher faecal SIgA levels compared with the standard formula‐fed infants reaching statistical significance at the age of 16 wk. In contrast, infants fed on the probiotic formula showed a highly variable faecal SIgA concentration with no statistically significant differences compared with the standard formula group. Formula‐fed infants may benefit from infant formulas containing a prebiotic mixture of GOS and FOS because of the observed clear tendency to increase faecal SIgA secretion. Adding viable B. animalis strain Bb‐12 to infant formula did not reveal any sign for such a trend.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field
Saad, N., Delattre, C., Urdaci, M., Schmitter, J. M., & Bressollier, P. (2013) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.014 · Cited by 522
Vanderpool, C., Yan, F., & Polk, B. D. (2008) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1002/ibd.20525 · Cited by 340
Lecerf, J.-M., Dépeint, F., Clerc, E., Dugenet, Y., Niamba, C. N., Rhazi, L., Cayzeele, A., Abdelnour, G., Jaruga, A., Younes, H., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114511007252 · Cited by 262
Prebiotics, immune function, infection and inflammation: a review of the evidence
Lomax, A. R., & Calder, P. C. (2008) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114508055608 · Cited by 257
Immunological properties of inulin-type fructans
Vogt, L., Meyer, D., Pullens, G., Faas, M., Smelt, M., Venema, K., Ramasamy, U., Schols, H. A., & De Vos, P. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.656772 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker‐Zierikzee, A. M., van Tol, E. A. F., Kroes, H., Alles, M. S., Kok, F. J., & Bindels, J. G.
- Venue
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-140
- ISSN
- 0905-6157 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3038
- OpenAlex
- W2161931891
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Faecal SIgA secretion in infants fed on pre‐ or probiotic infant formula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00370.x
- The paper
- Bakker‐Zierikzee, A. M., van Tol, E. A. F., Kroes, H., Alles, M. S., Kok, F. J., & Bindels, J. G. (2006). Faecal SIgA secretion in infants fed on pre‐ or probiotic infant formula. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00370.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.