Cited by 49Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Multisite, open-label, prospective trial of lamotrigine for geriatric bipolar depression: a preliminary report

Open access
Sajatovic, Martha, Gildengers, Ariel, Al Jurdi, Rayan K, Gyulai, Laszlo, Cassidy, Kristin A, Greenberg, Rebecca L, Bruce, Martha L, Mulsant, Benoit H +2 more·2011·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

AIMS: This is a multisite, 12-week, open-label trial of lamotrigine augmentation in 57 older adults (≥ 60 years; mean ± SD age = 66.5 ± 6.7 years) with either type I or type II bipolar depression. METHODS: Primary outcome measure was change from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcome measures included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP), and the WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II). The Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) was used to assess side effects. RESULTS: A total of 77.2% of the study subjects had bipolar I disorder. The mean (SD) lamotrigine dose was 150.9 (68.5) mg/day. There was significant improvement in the MADRS, HAM-D, CGI-BP, and in most domains on the WHO-DAS II. For patients for whom final MADRS score was available: 31 (57.4%) met remission criteria and 35 (64.8%) met response criteria. There were 19/57 (33.3%) who dropped out of the study prematurely, with 6 dropouts due to adverse events (4 cases of rash, 1 manic switch, and 1 hyponatremia). Two cases of rash were possibly drug related and were resolved with drug discontinuation. The most common UKU adverse effects were reduced sleep duration (n = 14, 24.6%), weight loss (n = 12, 21.1%), increased dream activity (n = 12, 21.1%), polyuria/polydipsia (n = 11, 19.3%), weight gain (n = 9, 15.8%), diminished sexual desire (n = 9, 15.8%), increased sleep (n = 9, 15.8%), lassitude/fatigue (n = 8, 14%), and unsteady gait (n = 8, 14%). No significant changes in electrocardiogram or laboratory tests were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In bipolar depressed elders, lamotrigine was associated with improvement in depression, psychopathology, and functional status. There was a moderate number of adverse events, although relationship of adverse events (particularly falls) to study medication could not be clearly determined in this uncontrolled trial. Controlled studies are needed to further evaluate efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine therapy in geriatric bipolar depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00923.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders-(SCID) Patient Edition 1996 Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York Version 2.0.
  2. [36]Reitan RM Wolfson D The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsycholgical Test Battery: Therapy and Clinical Interpretation 1985 Neuropsychological Press Tucson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sajatovic, M., Gildengers, A., Al Jurdi, R. K., Gyulai, L., Cassidy, K. A., Greenberg, R. L., Bruce, M. L., Mulsant, B. H., Ten Have, T., & Young, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Sajatovic, Martha
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
294-302
ISSN
1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1940801264
Cited by
49
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • University of Arkansas
  • Dartmouth College
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH067028)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
lamotrigine, bipolar depression, geriatric depression, older adults, bipolar I disorder, adverse drug reactions, rash, hyponatremia, manic switch, functional disability, sleep disorders, weight loss, sexual dysfunction, polyuria and polydipsia, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule
MeSH terms
Lamotrigine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bipolar Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Triazines, Antimanic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review