Cited by 132Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Scandinavian glutamine trial: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised clinical trial of intensive care unit patients

WERNERMAN, J., KIRKETEIG, T., ANDERSSON, B., BERTHELSON, H., ERSSON, A., FRIBERG, H., GUTTORMSEN, A. B., HENDRIKX, S. +5 more·2011·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background Low plasma glutamine concentration is an independent prognostic factor for an unfavourable outcome in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intravenous (i.v.) supplementation with glutamine is reported to improve outcome. In a multi-centric, double-blinded, controlled, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of i.v. glutamine supplementation for ICU patients, we investigated outcomes regarding sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and mortality. The hypothesis was that the change in the SOFA score would be improved by glutamine supplementation. Methods Patients (n=413) given nutrition by an enteral and/or a parenteral route with the aim of providing full nutrition were included within 72 h after ICU admission. Glutamine was supplemented as i.v. l-alanyl-l-glutamine, 0.283 g glutamine/kg body weight/24 h for the entire ICU stay. Placebo was saline in identical bottles. All included patients were considered as intention-to-treat patients. Patients given supplementation for >3 days were considered as predetermined per protocol (PP) patients. Results There was a lower ICU mortality in the treatment arm as compared with the controls in the PP group, but not at 6 months. For change in the SOFA scores, no differences were seen, 1 (0,3) vs. 2 (0.4), P=0.792, for the glutamine group and the controls, respectively. Conclusion In summary, a reduced ICU mortality was observed during i.v. glutamine supplementation in the PP group. The pragmatic design of the study makes the r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02453.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Scandinavian glutamine trial, the glutamine group had lower ICU mortality, which was not sustained at 6 months.

    “and a lower ICU mortality, which was not sustained at 6 months [47].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [47]

  • In the Scandinavian glutamine trial, intravenous glutamine supplementation in adequately fed ICU patients had no change in organ failure scores.

    “The glutamine group had no change in organ failure scores”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Since the 1990s, many studies in critically ill patients using GLN together with EN or PN at nutritional doses have shown benefits in terms of infectious complication reduction, lower mortality, and reduction of hospital costs.

    “Since the 1990s, many studies have been conducted in critically ill patients, mostly using GLN together with EN or PN at nutritional doses (0.2 to 0.3 g/kg/d of GLN); these trials have shown benefits in terms of infectious complication reduction, lower mortality (225, 226, 227) and reduction of hospital costs (228).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WERNERMAN, J., KIRKETEIG, T., ANDERSSON, B., BERTHELSON, H., ERSSON, A., FRIBERG, H., GUTTORMSEN, A. B., HENDRIKX, S., PETTILÄ, V., ROSSI, P., SJÖBERG, F., WINSÖ, O., & For the Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
Corresponding author
WERNERMAN, J.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-09
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
812-818
ISSN
0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162649248
Cited by
132
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Umeå Universitet
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
  • Göteborgs Universitet
  • Skånes universitetssjukhus
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
glutamine supplementation, L-alanyl-L-glutamine, intensive care unit patients, critically ill patients, ICU mortality, SOFA score, organ failure, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, nutritional support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Critical Care, Denmark, Double-Blind Method, Female, Finland, Glutamine, Humans, Iceland, Injections, Intravenous, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Norway, Sweden, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, APACHE, Endpoint Determination, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review