Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Policy Shocks, Market Intermediaries, and Corporate Strategy: The Evolution of Business Groups in Chile and India

Khanna, Tarun, Palepu, Krishna·1999·Journal of Economics & Management Strategy

Abstract

Numerous countries have undergone rapid transitions in their economic environments. Yet, little is known about firms' responses to such transitions. We use field‐collected data to study the evolution of eighteen large and diversified business groups in Chile (1987–1997) and India (1990–1997). The chosen periods correspond to significant deregulation in the primary markets in both countries. Conventional wisdom suggests that the intermediation roles played by business groups ought to decrease during these periods. However, we find an increase in group scope, an increase in the strength of the social and economic ties that bind together group firms, an increase in self‐reported intermediation attempts by the groups, and some evidence that these actions are associated with improvements in accounting and stock‐market performance of the group affiliates. We suggest that the slow development of market intermediaries, in a manner suggested by institutional economics, and the attendant lack of reduction in transaction costs in primary markets, can explain these findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00271.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1093/icc/3.1.111 · doi:10.1093/icc/3.1.111
  2. Aoki M., 1984, The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm
  3. Benston G. J., 1985, The Validity of Profits‐Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC's Line‐of‐Business Data, American Economic Review, 75, 37
  4. 10.1086/261104 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bosworth B., 1994, The Chilean Economy: Policy Lessons and Challenges
  6. Cortazar R., 1997, Labor Markets in Latin America: Combining Social Protection with Market Flexibility
  7. Dutta S., 1997, Family Business in India
  8. Eckstein H., 1975, Strategies of Inquiry
  9. Fisman R.andT.Khanna 1998 “Facilitating Development: The Role of Business Groups ”Harvard Business School Working Paper. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.98801
  10. Ghemawat P., 1997, Games Businesses Play: Cases and Models
  11. Ghemawat P., 1998, The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case Studies, Journal of Industrial Economics
  12. Ghemawat P., 1998, Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World
  13. Granovetter M., 1994, Handbook of Economic Sociology
  14. 10.1086/261959 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Guillén M. 1997 “Business Groups in Economic Development ”Best Paper Proceedings pp.170–174 Academy of Management Meetings Boston Academy of Management Proceedings. · doi:10.5465/ambpp.1997.4981326
  16. Joshi V., 1997, India's Economic Reforms: 1991–2001
  17. Kelkar V., 1996, India: Development Policy Imperatives
  18. Khanna T., 1997, Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets, Harvard Business Review, 75
  19. Khanna T., 1998, Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups, Journal of Finance
  20. Khanna T.andK.Palepu 1998b “The Future of Business Groups: Long Run Evidence from Chile ”Mimeo Harvard Business School working paper 99‐077. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Khanna T., 1998, NBER Volume of Concentrated Ownership
  22. Krueger A., 1974, The Political Economy of Rent‐Seeking Society, American Economic Review, 64
  23. Lang L., 1993, Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance, Journal of Political Economy, 102, 142
  24. Leff N., 1976, Money and Finance in Economic Development and Growth
  25. 10.1086/451052 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1086/296120 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2307/2555461 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90021-7 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2307/2109724 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Palepu K., 1998, Building Institutional Infrastructure in Emerging Markets, Brown Journal of World Affairs
  31. 10.2307/1882010 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1257/jep.10.3.135 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wernerfelt B., 1988, Tobins’ q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance, American Economic Review, 78, 246
  34. Williamson O., 1975, Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications
  35. Williamson O., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K.
Venue
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
271-310
ISSN
  • 1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9134
OpenAlex
W3125263594
Cited by
233
References
7
FWCI
37.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy Shocks, Market Intermediaries, and Corporate Strategy: The Evolution of Business Groups in Chile and India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00271.x
The paper
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1999). Policy Shocks, Market Intermediaries, and Corporate Strategy: The Evolution of Business Groups in Chile and India. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00271.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.