Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Refined Structure of the Selenoenzyme Glutathione Peroxidase at 0.2‐nm Resolution

Open access
EPP, Otto, LADENSTEIN, Rudolf, WENDEL, Albrecht·1983·European Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

The crystal structure of bovine erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase has been refined by a combined procedure of restrained crystallographic refinement and energy minimization at 0.20 nm resolution. The final R value at this resolution is 0.178. The r.m.s. deviation of main‐chain atoms of the two independently refined monomers is 0.019 nm. The structure at 0.28 nm resolution, which has been determined by multiple isomorphous replacement, served as a starting model. The refined model allowed a detailed survey of the hydrogen‐bonding pattern and of the subunit contact areas in the molecule. The model contains 165 solvent molecules per dimer, all taken as water molecules. The mobility of the structure was derived from the individual atomic temperature factors. The complete tetramer, including the active sites, seems to be rather rigid, except for narrow loops near to the N‐terminal ends and some β turns exposed to solvent. The active centres of glutathione peroxidase are found in flat depressions on the molecular surface. The catalytically active selenocysteine residues could be located at the N‐terminal ends of α helices forming βαβ substructures together with two adjacent parallel β strands. In the vicinity of the reactive group some aromatic amino acid side‐chains could be localized. Especially Trp‐148, which could be hydrogen bonded to SeCys‐35, may play a functional role during catalysis. The results of substrate and inhibitor binding studies in solution and in the crystalline state could be interpreted by an apparent half‐site reactivity of glutathione peroxidase. The enzyme seems to react in the sense of negative cooperativity with dimers being the functional units. Based on difference Fourier analyses of appropriate derivatives a reasonable model of glutathione binding is presented. Among the residues which could be of functional importance are Arg‐40, Gln‐130 and Arg‐167, presumably forming salt bridges and a hydrogen bond to the glutathione molecule. In conclusion, a general picture of a minimal reaction mechanism, which is in good agreement with functional and structural data, is proposed. The main reaction of the catalytic cycle presumably shuttles between the selenolate and the selenenic acid state of SeCys‐35.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07429.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
EPP, O., LADENSTEIN, R., & WENDEL, A.
Venue
European Journal of Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-06
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
51-69
ISSN
  • 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1033
OpenAlex
W1999014341
Cited by
689
References
1
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Refined Structure of the Selenoenzyme Glutathione Peroxidase at 0.2‐nm Resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07429.x
The paper
EPP, O., LADENSTEIN, R., & WENDEL, A. (1983). The Refined Structure of the Selenoenzyme Glutathione Peroxidase at 0.2‐nm Resolution. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07429.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.