Cited by 3Hormonal and reproductive studiesHair Growth and DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Predictors of pilosebaceous unit responsiveness to testosterone therapy in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism: CAG repeats and hypogonadism

Open access
Dhiman, P., Bhansali, A., Prasad, R., Dutta, P., Walia, R., Ravikiran, M.·2011·Andrologia

Abstract

Testosterone replacement therapy is the mainstay of treatment in male patients with isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) to achieve virilisation. However, responsiveness of pilosebaceous unit (PSU) to testosterone replacement therapy in these patients is quite variable. Androgen action is inversely proportional to the number of CAG repeats in exon 1 of androgen receptor gene; therefore, we hypothesised that CAG repeat length contributes to testosterone responsiveness in patients with HH. The CAG repeat length in 21 well-virilised men (hair score > 30, responders) and 25 poorly virilised men (hair score ≤ 30, non-responders) with HH on optimal testosterone replacement therapy at least for a period of 1 year was analysed. Serum LH, FSH, testosterone and 17 β oestradiol were estimated. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of exon 1 of androgen receptor gene was performed from genomic DNA, and these PCR-amplified products were sequenced for the number of CAG repeats. The difference between number of CAG repeats in responders and non-responders was statistically significant (19.19 ± 3.25 and 22.24 ± 2.65, P = 0.001) and showed a strong negative correlation with total body hair score (r = -0.538 and P = 0.0001). In conclusion, these results suggest that the number of CAG repeats influences the responsiveness of PSU to testosterone treatment in patients with HH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01093.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dhiman, P., Bhansali, A., Prasad, R., Dutta, P., Walia, R., & Ravikiran, M.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhansali, A.
Venue
Andrologia
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
422-427
ISSN
0303-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1859694271
Cited by
3
References
26
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, testosterone replacement therapy, pilosebaceous unit, androgen receptor, CAG repeat length, androgen insensitivity syndrome, masculinization, treatment response, male hypogonadism
MeSH terms
Adult, Base Sequence, Estradiol, Exons, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Receptors, Androgen, Testosterone, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Kallmann Syndrome, DNA Primers, Trinucleotide Repeats, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review