Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection

Dawkins, Richard·1979·Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie

Abstract

Abstract Hamilton's theory of kin selection is much misunderstood. This paper lists and refutes 12 of the commonest misunderstandings, for example: “Kin selection is a special, complex kind of natural selection, as opposed to ‘individual selection’”; “Kin selection is a form of group selection”; “All species members share the majority of their genes, so selection should favour universal altruism”; “Kin selection only works for rare genes”; “Individuals should tend to inbreed, simply because that brings close relatives into the world”. The exposing of common errors such as these is a constructive, not a destructive, exercise. Zusammenfassung Aus Hamilton's Theorie der Verwandtenselektion (kin selection) wurden verschiedentlich falsche Folgerungen gezogen, und das hat zu Mißtrauen gegenüber der Theorie Anlaß gegeben. Hier werden — ohne die Mathematik zu bemühen — zwölf häufige Irrtümer besprochen und richtiggestellt: (1) Verwandtenselektion ist eine besondere Form der natürlichen Selektion. — (2) Verwandtenselektion ist eine Form der Gruppenselektion. — (3) Verwandtenselektion erfordert erstaunliche Berechnungsfähigkeiten der Tiere. — (4) Ein „Gen für Altruismus” ist schwer vorstellbar. — (5) Alle Artgenossen haben die Mehrzahl ihrer Gene gemeinsam, also sollte die Selektion einen universellen Altruismus fördern. — (6) Verwandtenselektion funktioniert nur bei seltenen Genen. — (7) Altruismus ist notwendigerweise zu fordern unter genetisch gleichen Klon-Mitgliedern. — (8) Sterile Arbeiterinnen sorgen füreinander, weil sie besonders nah miteinander verwandt sind. — (9) Trivers' Theorie vom Eltern-Kind-Konflikt gilt nicht für monogame Arten. — (10) Individuen sollten zur Inzucht tendieren, weil das besonders nahe Verwandte in die Welt setzt. — (11) Wenn Verwandtschaft eher probabilistisch exakt erfaßt ist, dann werden Altruisten diejenigen Verwandten bevorzugen, die ihnen am meisten gleichen. — (12) Tiere sollten ihren Altruismus entsprechend dem jeweiligen Grad der Verwandtschaft auf ihre Verwandten verteilen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Dawkins, R.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-01-12
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
184-200
ISSN
0044-3573 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1945214363
Cited by
462
References
28
FWCI
71.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x
The paper
Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.