The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection
Abstract
Abstract Hamilton's theory of kin selection is much misunderstood. This paper lists and refutes 12 of the commonest misunderstandings, for example: “Kin selection is a special, complex kind of natural selection, as opposed to ‘individual selection’”; “Kin selection is a form of group selection”; “All species members share the majority of their genes, so selection should favour universal altruism”; “Kin selection only works for rare genes”; “Individuals should tend to inbreed, simply because that brings close relatives into the world”. The exposing of common errors such as these is a constructive, not a destructive, exercise. Zusammenfassung Aus Hamilton's Theorie der Verwandtenselektion (kin selection) wurden verschiedentlich falsche Folgerungen gezogen, und das hat zu Mißtrauen gegenüber der Theorie Anlaß gegeben. Hier werden — ohne die Mathematik zu bemühen — zwölf häufige Irrtümer besprochen und richtiggestellt: (1) Verwandtenselektion ist eine besondere Form der natürlichen Selektion. — (2) Verwandtenselektion ist eine Form der Gruppenselektion. — (3) Verwandtenselektion erfordert erstaunliche Berechnungsfähigkeiten der Tiere. — (4) Ein „Gen für Altruismus” ist schwer vorstellbar. — (5) Alle Artgenossen haben die Mehrzahl ihrer Gene gemeinsam, also sollte die Selektion einen universellen Altruismus fördern. — (6) Verwandtenselektion funktioniert nur bei seltenen Genen. — (7) Altruismus ist notwendigerweise zu fordern unter genetisch gleichen Klon-Mitgliedern. — (8) Sterile Arbeiterinnen sorgen füreinander, weil sie besonders nah miteinander verwandt sind. — (9) Trivers' Theorie vom Eltern-Kind-Konflikt gilt nicht für monogame Arten. — (10) Individuen sollten zur Inzucht tendieren, weil das besonders nahe Verwandte in die Welt setzt. — (11) Wenn Verwandtschaft eher probabilistisch exakt erfaßt ist, dann werden Altruisten diejenigen Verwandten bevorzugen, die ihnen am meisten gleichen. — (12) Tiere sollten ihren Altruismus entsprechend dem jeweiligen Grad der Verwandtschaft auf ihre Verwandten verteilen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
TRIVERS, R. L. (1974) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/14.1.249 · Cited by 4,172
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 · Cited by 4,144
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts
Maynard Smith, J. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6 · Cited by 2,410
The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior
Hamilton, W. D. (1963) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/497114 · Cited by 2,020
Group Selection and Kin Selection
SMITH, J. M. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2011145a0 · Cited by 2,020
The logic of asymmetric contests
Smith, J. M., & Parker, G. A. (1976) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(76)80110-8 · Cited by 1,945
(1978) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0047-2484(78)80055-4 · Cited by 1,835
Wilson, D. S. (1975) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.72.1.143 · Cited by 1,259
Cited by
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889
Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion.
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187 · Cited by 1,424
Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/701478 · Cited by 734
Consciousness, explanatory inversion and cognitive science
Searle, J. R. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00029587 · Cited by 490
Consciousness, explanatory inversion, and cognitive science
Searle, J. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00080304 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawkins, R.
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-01-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-200
- ISSN
- 0044-3573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1945214363
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 71.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x
- The paper
- Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.