CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Behavioural Effects of Silent Bared Teeth Display and Relaxed Open Mouth Display in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Waller, Bridget M., Dunbar, Robin I. M.·2005·Ethology
DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01045.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines the behavioural consequences of the silent bared teeth display (SBT) and the relaxed open mouth display (ROM) in the chimpanzee, and discusses functional similarities with smiling and laughing (respectively) in humans. Rates of affinitive behaviour increase (in relation to baseline levels) following SBT, suggesting that SBT is a signal of affinity. ROM is observed primarily during play, and dyadic play bouts are significantly longer when ROM is bidirectional, indicating that it may be a signal of play. Rates of affinitive behaviour also increased after ROM, suggesting that both displays may have a similar ultimate (evolutionary) function – social bonding; this could explain convergence of the two displays in humans.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01045.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1126/science.142.3595.1034 · DOI
  2. Bekoff M., 1981, Behavioural Development: the Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project, 297
  3. Bellingham L., 2002, Principles of Social Attraction in Female Barbary Macaques, Macaca sylvanus
  4. Chevalier‐Skolnikoff S., 1973, Darwin and Facial Expression, 11
  5. Dunbar R. I. M., 1996, Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language
  6. Dunbar R. I. M., 2004, The Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach
  7. Ekman P., 1982, Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behaviour Research, 45
  8. Goodall J., 1965, Primate Behaviour – Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, 425
  9. Goodall J., 1986, The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behaviour
  10. Hooff J. A. R. A. M., 1972, Non‐Verbal Communication
  11. Hooff J. A. R. A. M., 1973, Social Communication and Movement, 75
  12. Ladygina‐Kohts N. N., 2002, Infant Chimpanzee and Human Child: A Classic 1935 Comparative Study of Ape Emotions and Intelligence
  13. 10.3758/BF03329317 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00159-8 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10071-004-0207-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1075/eoc.2.1.02par · DOI
  17. 10.1016/1359-1789(95)00016-X · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1997)23:1<41::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  19. Preuschoft S., 1995, ‘Laughter’ and ‘Smiling’ in Macaques – an Evolutionary Perspective
  20. Provine R. R., 2000, Laughter ‐ A Scientific Investigation
  21. Redican W. K., 1982, Emotions in the Human Face, 212
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:2<39::AID-EVAN2>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.032902.101743 · DOI
  24. 10.1159/000156396 · DOI
  25. 10.1086/398642 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/ajp.1350090202 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/BF00302695 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waller, B. M., & Dunbar, R. I. M.
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
129-142
ISSN
  • 0179-1613
  • 1439-0310
DOI
10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01045.x
Cited by
146
References
3
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 2 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review