The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aquaculture and stress management: a review of probiotic intervention
Open accessAbstract
Summary: To meet the ever‐increasing demand for animal protein, aquaculture continuously requires new techniques to increase the production yield. However, with every step towards intensification of aquaculture practices, there is an increase in stress level on the animal as well as on the environment. Feeding practices in aqua farming usually plays an important role, and the addition of various additives to a balanced feed formula to achieve better growth is a common practice among the fish and shrimp culturists. Probiotics, also known as ‘bio‐friendly agents’, such as LAB (Lactobacillus), yeasts and Bacillus sp., can be introduced into the culture environment to control and compete with pathogenic bacteria as well as to promote the growth of the cultured organisms. In addition, probiotics are non‐pathogenic and non‐toxic micro‐organisms, having no undesirable side effects when administered to aquatic organisms. Probiotics are also known to play an important role in developing innate immunity among the fishes, and hence help them to fight against any pathogenic bacterias as well as against environmental stressors. The present review is a brief but informative compilation of the different essential and desirable traits of probiotics, their mode of action and their useful effects on fishes. The review also highlights the role of probiotics in helping the fishes to combat against the different physical, chemical and biological stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Choi, S.-H., & Yoon, T. J. (2008) · Immune Network · doi:10.4110/in.2008.8.3.67 · Cited by 31
RetractedDietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,667
Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding
Hartl, F. U. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381571a0 · Cited by 3,568
Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.
Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M. C. M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H., & Troell, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016500 · Cited by 3,063
Cabello, F. C. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x · Cited by 2,329
Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture
Verschuere, L., Rombaut, G., Sorgeloos, P., & Verstraete, W. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.655-671.2000 · Cited by 2,283
OXIDATIVE STRESS IN MARINE ENVIRONMENTS: Biochemistry and Physiological Ecology
Lesser, M. P. (2006) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.110001 · Cited by 1,833
The role of probiotics in aquaculture
BALCAZAR, J., BLAS, I., RUIZZARZUELA, I., CUNNINGHAM, D., VENDRELL, D., & MUZQUIZ, J. (2006) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009 · Cited by 1,341
Current research status of fish immunostimulants
Sakai, M. (1999) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(98)00436-0 · Cited by 1,340
Role of the prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrate immunity
Söderhäll, K., & Cerenius, L. (1998) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80026-5 · Cited by 1,335
Cited by
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Wang, T., Cheng, Y., Chen, X., Liu, Z., & Long, X. (2017) · Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology · doi:10.1007/s00343-016-5130-1 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohapatra, S., Chakraborty, T., Kumar, V., DeBoeck, G., & Mohanta, K. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-19
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-430
- ISSN
- 0931-2439 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0396
- OpenAlex
- W1684954308
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 163
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aquaculture and stress management: a review of probiotic intervention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01301.x
- The paper
- Mohapatra, S., Chakraborty, T., Kumar, V., DeBoeck, G., & Mohanta, K. N. (2013). Aquaculture and stress management: a review of probiotic intervention. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01301.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.