Cited by 28Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchNail Diseases and Treatments

Self-elimination of risk factors for recurrent vaginal candidosis: Risk factors in recurrent vaginal candidosis

Donders, Gilbert G. G., Mertens, Ine, Bellen, Gert, Pelckmans, Sophie·2011·Mycoses

Abstract

Women suffering from recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidosis (RVC) often follow medical and non-medical advices to diminish the severity and frequency of the recurrences, but the impact of such interventions is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify differences in life style habits of women with RVC compared with normal women and to define which changes have influenced the frequency of recurrences in these women. Fifty-one women with RVC and 51 age-matched control women without a history of RVC were sent a questionnaire. History of allergic disease (OR 2.8) and use of corticoids (OR 5) were more frequent in patients with RVC than controls. When interrogated about beneficial changes introduced in their life style habits, lowering the intake of sugars, preventing perineum humidity and stopping contraceptive pills were factors offering substantial improvement. Apart from an increased risk of having an allergic constitution, no differences in the medical history or life style habits were evident between women with RVC and healthy women. However, women with RVC have introduced several changes in life style habits that proved beneficial to them. Among these changes, lowering intake of sugars, preventing perineum humidity and stopping oral contraceptives were the most important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01754.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As part of the treatment plan in women with altered glucose tolerance, lowering glycemia by reducing the intake of sugars or by glucose-lowering medication may be important.

    “As part of the treatment plan in women with an altered glucose tolerance, lowering glycemia by the reducing the intake of sugars or by glucose lowering medication may be important (Donders et al., 2011), whereas pregnancy anticipation in women of childbearing age is of relevance in the self-management of RVVC.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donders, G. G. G., Mertens, I., Bellen, G., & Pelckmans, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Donders, Gilbert G. G.
Venue
Mycoses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
39-45
ISSN
  • 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
  • 0933-7407
OpenAlex
W1521540681
Cited by
28
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycoses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, lifestyle habits, risk factors, sugar consumption, oral contraceptives, corticosteroid use, allergic diseases, self-management, recurrence prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Self Care, Case-Control Studies, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review