The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Curcumin‐loaded poly(ε‐caprolactone) nanofibres: Diabetic wound dressing with anti‐oxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Curcumin is a naturally occurring poly‐phenolic compound with a broad range of favourable biological functions, including anti‐cancer, anti‐oxidant and anti‐inflammatory activities. The low bioavailability and in vivo stability of curcumin require the development of suitable carrier vehicles to deliver the molecule in a sustained manner at therapeutic levels. In the present study, we investigated the feasibility and potential of poly(caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibres as a delivery vehicle for curcumin for wound healing applications. By optimizing the electrospinning parameters, bead‐free curcumin‐loaded PCL nanofibres were developed. The fibres showed sustained release of curcumin for 72 h and could be made to deliver a dose much lower than the reported cytotoxic concentration while remaining bioactive. Human foreskin fibroblast cells (HFF‐1) showed more than 70% viability on curcumin‐loaded nanofibres. The anti‐oxidant activity of curcumin‐loaded nanofibres was demonstrated using an oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay and by the ability of the fibres to maintain the viability of HFF‐1 cells under conditions of oxidative stress. The curcumin‐loaded nanofibres also reduced inflammatory induction, as evidenced by low levels of interleukin‐6 release from mouse monocyte–macrophages seeded onto the fibres following stimulation by Escherichia coli‐derived lipopolysaccharide. The in vivo wound healing capability of the curcumin loaded PCL nanofibres was demonstrated by an increased rate of wound closure in a streptozotocin‐induced diabetic mice model. These results demonstrate that the curcumin‐loaded PCL nanofibre matrix is bioactive and has potential as a wound dressing with anti‐oxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patel, S., Srivastava, S., Singh, M. R., & Singh, D. (2019) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108615 · Cited by 1,049
Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing
Veith, A. P., Henderson, K., Spencer, A., Sligar, A. D., & Baker, A. B. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010 · Cited by 1,021
The Role of Antioxidants on Wound Healing: A Review of the Current Evidence
Comino-Sanz, I. M., López-Franco, M. D., Castro, B., & Pancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10163558 · Cited by 412
Recent Advances in Electrospun Nanofibers for Wound Healing
Chen, S., Liu, B., Carlson, M. A., Gombart, A. F., Reilly, D. A., & Xie, J. (2017) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0017 · Cited by 409
Fahimirad, S., Abtahi, H., Satei, P., Ghaznavi-Rad, E., Moslehi, M., & Ganji, A. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117640 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Merrell, J. G., McLaughlin, S. W., Tie, L., Laurencin, C. T., Chen, A. F., & Nair, L. S.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-25
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1149-1156
- ISSN
- 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1681
- OpenAlex
- W2143635681
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Curcumin‐loaded poly(ε‐caprolactone) nanofibres: Diabetic wound dressing with anti‐oxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05216.x
- The paper
- Merrell, J. G., McLaughlin, S. W., Tie, L., Laurencin, C. T., Chen, A. F., & Nair, L. S. (2009). Curcumin‐loaded poly(ε‐caprolactone) nanofibres: Diabetic wound dressing with anti‐oxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05216.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.