Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐genetic risk factors and predicting efficacy for docetaxel–drug‐induced liver injury among metastatic breast cancer patients

Wang, Zheng, Liang, Xu, Yu, Jing, Zheng, Xiaohui, Zhu, Yulin, Yan, Ying, Dong, Ningning, Di, Lijun, Song, Guohong, Zhou, Xinna, Wang, Xiaoli, Yang, Huabing, Ren, Jun, Lyerly, Herbert Kim·2012·Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background and Aim: Docetaxel has been chosen as one of the most popular anticancer drugs in the treatment of breast cancer for more than a decade. There is increasingly awareness for the occurrence of docetaxel and/or docetaxel–drug‐induced liver injury (DILI), although the underlying mechanism of occurrence and its risk factors remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify non‐genetic risk factors for docetaxel–DILI among 647 metastasis breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel‐containing regimens. Results: Sixty‐seven (10.36%) patients were diagnosed as docetaxel–DILI. By logistic regression analysis, premenopausal status (odds ratio [OR][95% confidence interval {CI}] = 2.24 [1.30–3.87]), past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections (OR [95% CI] = 4.23 [1.57–11.42]), liver metastasis (OR [95% CI] = 3.70 [2.16–6.34]). The predominant occurrence of DILI was seen in groups with docetaxel combination regimens. (OR [95% CI] = 2.66 [1.59–4.55]). The potential increasing occurrence of docetaxel–DILI was associated with multiple risk factors in an exposure–response manner (P < 0.001), and patients with more than three risk factors would be exposed to a 36.61‐fold risk of DILI (95% CI = 10.18–131.62). Further analysis by the risk score and area under the receiver–operator characteristic curve (AUC) showed that those four factors contributed to an AUC of 0.7536 (95% CI = 0.70–0.81), with a predictive sensitivity of 74.63% and specificity of 65.17%. Conclusions: Docetaxel–DILI with a relatively higher incidence should be addressed among metastatic breast cancer patients. Four predominant risk factors, including premenopausal status, past HBV infection, liver metastasis, and docetaxel combination regimens, were potential predicators for DILI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07131.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liver injury caused by antineoplastic or immunomodulators includes hepatocyte necrosis, hepatic steatosis, hepatic mitochondrial injury, cholestasis and vascular injury.

    “Liver injury caused by antineoplastic or immunomodulators includes hepatocyte necrosis, hepatic steatosis, hepatic mitochondrial injury, cholestasis and vascular injury.[42][43][44][45]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1038/nbt.1627 · DOI
  2. 10.2217/pgs.09.111 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/hep.22895 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1055/s-0029-1240002 · DOI
  5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/hep.21848 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.030 · DOI
  8. 10.1517/14740338.1.2.159 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00072.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/hep.22272 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/hep.23317 · DOI
  13. 10.1245/s10434-009-0512-7 · DOI
  14. 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.3.397 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00031-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-A · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03117.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90846-S · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hep.21872 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nrd2423 · DOI
  23. 10.1055/s-0029-1240009 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ng.379 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Liang, X., Yu, J., Zheng, X., Zhu, Y., Yan, Y., Dong, N., Di, L., Song, G., Zhou, X., Wang, X., Yang, H., Ren, J., & Lyerly, H. K.
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-23
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1348-1352
ISSN
  • 0815-9319
  • 1440-1746
Cited by
21
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review