Cited by 72Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Childhood emotional abuse, dissociation, and suicidality among patients with drug dependency in Turkey

Open access
Tamar‐Gurol, Defne, Sar, Vedat, Karadag, Figen, Evren, Cuneyt, Karagoz, Mustafa·2008·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and correlates of dissociative disorders among patients with drug dependency. Methods: The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) was used to screen 104 consecutive patients at an addiction treatment center. Thirty‐seven patients who had scores ≥30 were compared with 21 patients who scored <10 on the DES. Both groups were then evaluated using the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule and the Structured Clinical Interview for Dissociative Disorders (SCID‐D). The interviewers were blind to the DES scores. Results: Twenty‐seven patients (26.0%) had a dissociative disorder according to the SCID‐D. Dissociative patients were younger than the non‐dissociative group. History of suicide attempt and/or childhood emotional abuse was significant predictors of a dissociative disorder. The majority (59.3%) of dissociative drug users reported that dissociative experiences had existed prior to substance use. More patients in the dissociative disorder than in the non‐dissociative group stopped their treatment prematurely. Conclusion: A considerable proportion of drug users have a dissociative disorder, which may also interfere with treatment process. The relatively young age of this subgroup of patients and frequent reports of childhood emotional abuse underline potential preventive benefits of early intervention among adolescents with developmental trauma history and dissociative psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01847.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamar‐Gurol, D., Sar, V., Karadag, F., Evren, C., & Karagoz, M.
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
540-547
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W1735632831
Cited by
72
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
childhood emotional abuse, dissociative disorders, suicidality, drug addiction, substance use disorders, suicide attempts, developmental trauma, addiction treatment, treatment discontinuation, Dissociative Experiences Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Personality Inventory, Risk Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Illicit Drugs, Suicide, Attempted, Turkey, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review