Cited by 50Liver physiology and pathologyChemokine receptors and signalingCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Systemic expression of a newly recognized protein, LECT2, in the human body

Nagal, Hisakazu, Hamada, Tomoml, Uchida, Toshikazu, Yamagoe, Satoshi, Suzuki, Kazuo·1998·Pathology International

Abstract

LECT2 (leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2) is a new, recently isolated protein shown to be synthesized by hepatocytes. All hepatocytes show diffuse immunostaining for LECT2 within the cytoplasm. In the present study an attempt was made to investigate the expression of LECT2 in normal and diseased human organs and tissues, other than the liver, using indirect immunoperoxidase staining. LECT2 was found to be generally expressed in vascular, endothelial and smooth muscle cells, adipocytes, cerebral nerve cells, apical squamous epithelia, parathyroid cells, sweat and sebaceous glandular epithelia, Hassall bodies and some mononuclear cells in immunohematopoietic tissue, although some of these cells and tissues were occasionally unstained in diseased conditions. Alternatively, this protein was generally negative, although it was occasionally positively stained in osteoblasts, chondrocytes, cardiac and skeletal muscle cells, smooth muscle cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and the epithelial cells of some tissues. LECT2 seems to be related to the cell cycle or repair process following damage to a variety of cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1998.tb03855.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tissues normally lacking LECT2 exhibit increased expression of LECT2 in disease settings, indicating improper upregulation of LECT2 may contribute to pathological conditions.

    “Interestingly, tissues normally lacking LECT2 exhibit increased expression of LECT2 in disease settings, indicating that improper upregulation of LECT2 may contribute to pathological conditions [246,247].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagal, H., Hamada, T., Uchida, T., Yamagoe, S., & Suzuki, K.
Affiliations
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • National Institute of Infectious Diseases (JP)
Corresponding author
Uchida, Toshikazu
Venue
Pathology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
882-886
ISSN
  • 1320-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1827
OpenAlex
W2157464785
Cited by
50
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pathology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
LECT2, protein expression, tissue distribution, hepatocytes, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, adipocytes, cell cycle, tissue repair, chemokines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chemotactic Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Infant, Male, Neoplasms, Organ Specificity, Tissue Distribution, Protein Biosynthesis, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review