Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of the Poincaré plot to heart rate variability: a new measure of functional status in heart failure

Kamen, P. W., Tonkin, A. M.·1995·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background: Conventional methods of quantifying heart rate variability using summary statistics have shown that decreased variability is associated with increased mortality in heart failure. However, many patients with heart failure have arrhythmias which make the ‘raw’ heart rate variability data less suitable for the use of summary statistical measures. Aims: To examine the clinical potential of a new measure of heart rate variability data, presented by the Poincare plot pattern, as an adjunct to the summary statistical measures of R‐R interval Methods: We used the Poincaré plot pattern to display beat‐to‐beat heart rate variability data from a group of 23 patients with heart failure and compared them with data collected from 20 healthy age‐matched control subjects. The data, which consisted of 2000 consecutive R‐R intervals, were gathered over 20–40 minutes while the subjects rested supine in a quiet darkened room. Results: The morphological classification scheme proposed reflected the functional status of patients in heart failure. There was a significant difference (chi‐square = 27.5, df = 6, ρ < 0.0001) in the different pattern types between patients with NYHA Class I and II compared to patients with NYHA Class III and IV. All healthy subjects displayed a ‘cluster’ type of pattern characterised by normally distributed data. Sixteen of the 23 patients in heart failure also produced data which were normally distributed but the remaining seven produced data which required careful filtering to make them suitable for analysis using summary statistics, but which could be analysed by the Poincare plot. Conclusions: The Poincaréot pattern is a semi‐quantitative tool which can be applied to the analysis of R‐R interval data. It has potential advantages in that it allows assessment of data which are grossly non‐Gaussian in distribution, and is a simple and easily implemented method which can be used in a clinical setting to augment the standard electrocardiogram to provide ‘real time’ visualisation of data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb00573.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Kamen, P. W., & Tonkin, A. M.
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
0004-8291 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048811598
Cited by
202
References
6
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of the Poincaré plot to heart rate variability: a new measure of functional status in heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb00573.x
The paper
Kamen, P. W., & Tonkin, A. M. (1995). Application of the Poincaré plot to heart rate variability: a new measure of functional status in heart failure. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb00573.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.