Cited by 1,028Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity.

Hasking, G J, Esler, M D, Jennings, G L, Burton, D, Johns, J A, Korner, P I·1986·Circulation

Abstract

The analysis of plasma kinetics of the sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine can be used to estimate sympathetic nervous "activity" (integrated nerve firing rate) for the body as a whole and for individual organs. In 12 patients with cardiac failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 10% to 39%), the mean arterial plasma norepinephrine concentration was 557 +/- 68 pg/ml (mean +/- SE) compared with 211 +/- 21 pg/ml in 15 subjects without heart failure (p less than .002). The difference was due to both increased release of norepinephrine to plasma (indicating increased "total" sympathetic activity) and reduced clearance of norepinephrine from plasma. The increase in sympathetic activity did not involve all organs equally. Cardiac (32 +/- 9 vs 5 +/- 1 ng/min; p less than .002) and renal (202 +/- 45 vs 66 +/- 9 ng/min; p = .002) norepinephrine spillover were increased by 540% and 206%, respectively, but norepinephrine spillover from the lungs was normal. Adrenomedullary activity was also increased in the patients with heart failure, whose mean arterial plasma epinephrine concentration was 181 +/- 38 pg/ml compared with 71 +/- 12 pg/ml in control subjects (p less than .02). There is marked regional variation, inapparent from measurements of plasma norepinephrine concentration, in sympathetic nerve activity in patients with congestive heart failure. The finding of increased cardiorenal norepinephrine spillover has important pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.73.4.615

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasking, G. J., Esler, M. D., Jennings, G. L., Burton, D., Johns, J. A., & Korner, P. I.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1986-04
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
615-621
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2071526303
Cited by
1,028
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
norepinephrine spillover, congestive heart failure, sympathetic activity, norepinephrine clearance, epinephrine
MeSH terms
Female, Heart Conduction System, Heart Failure, Hemodynamics, Humans, Kidney, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardium, Norepinephrine, Receptors, Adrenergic, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review