Cited by 97Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Health and Development

Effect of home-based peer support on maternal-infant interactions among women with postpartum depression: A randomized, controlled trial: POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION HOME-BASED SUPPORT

Letourneau, Nicole, Stewart, Miriam, Dennis, Cindy-Lee, Hegadoren, Kathleen, Duffett-Leger, Linda, Watson, Barry·2011·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Approximately 15% of new mothers experience postpartum depression, representing the most common source of maternal morbidity post-delivery. Postpartum depression may impair maternal-infant interactions, contributing to poor developmental outcomes in the offspring of mothers with depression. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of home-based peer support that included maternal-infant interaction teaching for mothers with symptoms of postpartum depression and their infants. Mothers with postpartum depression were randomly assigned to control (n = 33) or intervention groups (n = 27). Intervention group mothers received 12 weeks of home-based peer support that included maternal-infant interaction teaching; peers were mothers who had recovered from postpartum depression and were trained to provide support. Data were collected from all mothers at baseline, as well as 6 and 12 weeks' post-randomization. Contrary to the hypothesized direction of relationships, results favoured the control group. A significant difference between the groups was observed for one of the two measures of maternal-infant interactions. Several other measures favoured the control group, including mothers' depressive symptoms and social support scores. No significant treatment effects were observed in infant IQ scores or diurnal salivary cortisol levels in mothers or infants. The findings suggest that maternal-infant interaction teaching by peers is not well received by mothers with postpartum depression and might be more optimally delivered by professional nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00736.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Letourneau, N., Stewart, M., Dennis, C.-L., Hegadoren, K., Duffett-Leger, L., & Watson, B.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Letourneau, Nicole
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-08
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
345-357
ISSN
1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150490549
Cited by
97
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
postpartum depression, mother-infant interaction, peer support, social support, maternal depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Educational Status, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Mother-Child Relations, Peer Group, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Social Support, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review