Cited by 137Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

A Systematic Review of the Attributes and Outcomes of Peer Work and Guidelines for Reporting Studies of Peer Interventions

Open access
King, Alicia Jean, Simmons, Magenta Bender·2018·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this review was to describe key attributes and outcome measures reported in controlled trials of peer work, identify outcome measures likely to report significant change as a result of peer work, assess the quality of reporting, and formulate guidelines for the design and reporting of future trials.Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of peer work published since 1995.A content analysis identified reported program attributes in seven areas.Outcome measures were compared with results to identify measures most likely to report a significant difference as a result of peer work.Descriptions of program attributes were rated with respect to how clearly they were specified by authors.Results: A total of 37 studies were included.Program attributes varied widely, particularly the services that peers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201700564

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In broader contexts, definitions of a peer most commonly refer to those who have lived experience with mental health difficulties or have used mental health services in clinical settings.

    “In broader contexts, definitions of a peer most commonly refer to those who have lived experience with mental health difficulties or have used mental health services in clinical settings.28”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, A. J., & Simmons, M. B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
961-977
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2810489279
Cited by
137
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
peer work, peer intervention, program characteristics, outcome measures, reporting quality, reporting guidelines, randomized controlled trials, peer support services
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Peer Group, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Guidelines as Topic, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review